Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Luke,
I hope so. I'll keep you and the list up-to-date as I learn more.
Steve
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
- From: "Steve Poe" <steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com>
- To: "Luke Lonergan" <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
- Cc: "Alex Turner" <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
- Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:56:38 -0700
Luke,
I hope so. I'll keep you and the list up-to-date as I learn more.
Steve
On 8/8/06, Luke Lonergan <
LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> wrote:
Steve,
> I will do that. If it is the general impression that this
> server should perform well with Postgresql, Are the RAID
> cards, the 6i and 642 sufficient to your knowledge? I am
> wondering if it is the disc array itself.
I think that is the question to be answered by HP support. Ask them for
technical support for the Linux driver for the 6i and 642. If they
offer support, they should quickly figure out what the problem is. If
they don't provide support, I would send the server back to them if you
can and buy a Sun server with an LSI RAID adapter.
- Luke
- References:
- Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
- From: Luke Lonergan
- Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
- Prev by Date: Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
- Next by Date: Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000
- Previous by thread: Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
- Next by thread: Optimizing queries
- Indexes: