Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and SmartArray 642
- From: Jeff Trout <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
- To: steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com
- Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and SmartArray 642
- Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 08:20:22 -0400
On Aug 5, 2006, at 7:10 PM, Steve Poe wrote:
Has anyone worked with server before. I've read the SmartArray 6i is a poor performer, I wonder if the SmartArray 642 adapter would have the same fate?
My newest db is a DL385, 6 disks. It runs very nicely. I have no issues with the 6i controller. If you look in the pgsql-performance archives a week or two ago you'll see a similar thread to this one - in fact, it is also about a dl385 (but he had a 5i controller)
-- Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com> http://www.dellsmartexitin.com/ http://www.stuarthamm.net/
- References:
- Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and SmartArray 642
- From: Steve Poe
- Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and SmartArray 642
- Prev by Date: Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good enough
- Next by Date: Re: shared_buffer optimization
- Previous by thread: Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
- Next by thread: vacuuming
- Indexes: