Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search archives
  Advanced Search

Re: Performances with new Intel Core* processors


  • From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
  • To: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing(at)tweakers(dot)net>
  • Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jonathan Ballet <jon(at)multani(dot)info>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
  • Subject: Re: Performances with new Intel Core* processors
  • Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:27:45 -0500
  • Message-id: <1154377665.6095.16.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <text/plain>

On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 11:30, Arjen van der Meijden wrote:
> On 31-7-2006 17:52, Merlin Moncure wrote:

> For a database system, however, processors hardly ever are the main 
> bottleneck, are they? So you should probably go for a set of "fast 
> processors" from your favorite supplier and focus mainly on lots of 
> memory and fast disks. Whether that employs Opterons or Xeon Woodcrest 
> (no other Xeons are up to that competition, imho) doesn't really matter.

Just making a quick comment here.  While the CPU core itself nowadays
certainly is not the most common bottleneck for a fast db server, the
ability of the CPU/Memory combo to act as a datapump IS often a limit.

In that case, you want to go with whichever setup gives you the fastest
access to memory.



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996 – 2012 PostgreSQL Global Development Group