Re: Performances with new Intel Core* processors
- From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
- To: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing(at)tweakers(dot)net>
- Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jonathan Ballet <jon(at)multani(dot)info>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Performances with new Intel Core* processors
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:27:45 -0500
- Message-id: <1154377665.6095.16.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <text/plain>
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 11:30, Arjen van der Meijden wrote:
> On 31-7-2006 17:52, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> For a database system, however, processors hardly ever are the main
> bottleneck, are they? So you should probably go for a set of "fast
> processors" from your favorite supplier and focus mainly on lots of
> memory and fast disks. Whether that employs Opterons or Xeon Woodcrest
> (no other Xeons are up to that competition, imho) doesn't really matter.
Just making a quick comment here. While the CPU core itself nowadays
certainly is not the most common bottleneck for a fast db server, the
ability of the CPU/Memory combo to act as a datapump IS often a limit.
In that case, you want to go with whichever setup gives you the fastest
access to memory.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index