Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
- Cc: Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:44:19 -0400
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes: >>> 18% in s_lock is definitely bad :-(. Were you able to determine which >>> LWLock(s) are accounting for the contention? >> >> Yes. We were interested in that too. Some people did addtional tests >> to determin that. I don't have the report handy now. I will report >> back next week. > Sorry for the delay. Finally I got the oprofile data. It's > huge(34MB). If you are interested, I can put somewhere. Please let me > know. Yes, please. regards, tom lane
- References:
- Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
- From: Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
- Prev by Date: Re: hyper slow after upgrade to 8.1.4
- Next by Date: Re: size of pg_dump files containing bytea values
- Previous by thread: Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
- Next by thread: Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
- Indexes: