• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-cygwin
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-interfaces
    • pgsql-jdbc
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-odbc
    • pgsql -performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-ports
    • pgsql-sql
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Project lists
  • User groups
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-performance 2006-06 Thread Index (2/3)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql?, (continued)
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? A. Kretschmer
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? Chris Browne
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? kah_hang_ang
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? A. Kretschmer
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? kah_hang_ang
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? Nis Jorgensen
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? Dan Harris
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? Bill Moran
• Re: Effects of cascading references in foreign keys Bruce Momjian
• Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Dan Gorman
• Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Mark Lewis
• Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Greg Stark
• Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Jonah H. Harris
• Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Dan Gorman
• Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Jonah H. Harris
• Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Jonah H. Harris
• Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Joe Conway
• Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Dan Gorman
• Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Jim C. Nasby
• Postgres consuming way too much memory??? jody brownell
• Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? Tom Lane
• Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? jody brownell
• Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? jody brownell
• Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? jody brownell
• Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? Tom Lane
• Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? Mark Lewis
• Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? Tom Lane
• Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? jody brownell
• Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? Tom Lane
• Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? Bruce Momjian
• Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 John E. Vincent
• Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 Tom Lane
• Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 Scott Marlowe
• Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 John Vincent
• Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 A.M.
• Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 Scott Marlowe
• Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 John Vincent
• Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 John Vincent
• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 Scott Marlowe
    • Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 John Vincent
• Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 Jim C. Nasby
• Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 John Vincent
• Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 Jim C. Nasby
• Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 Merlin Moncure
• Precomputed constants? Böszörményi Zoltán
• Re: Precomputed constants? Volkan YAZICI
• Re: Precomputed constants? Böszörményi Zoltán
• Re: Precomputed constants? Jim C. Nasby
• Re: Precomputed constants? Zoltan Boszormenyi
• Re: Precomputed constants? Jim C. Nasby
• Re: Precomputed constants? Zoltan Boszormenyi
• Re: Precomputed constants? Jim Nasby
• how to partition disks hubert depesz lubaczewski
• Re: how to partition disks Sven Geisler
• Re: how to partition disks hubert depesz lubaczewski
• Re: how to partition disks Sven Geisler
• Re: how to partition disks Richard Broersma Jr
• Re: how to partition disks Sven Geisler
• Re: how to partition disks Jim C. Nasby
• Re: how to partition disks Michael Stone
• Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Steve Poe
• Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Scott Marlowe
• Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? David Boreham
• Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Bruce Momjian
• Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Joshua D. Drake
• Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Jim C. Nasby
• Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Chris Browne
• Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Vivek Khera
• Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Steve Poe
• Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Vivek Khera
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Dave Page
• Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Steve Poe
• Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Scott Marlowe
• Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Dave Page
• Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Scott Marlowe
• Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Dave Page
• Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 tree Shaun Thomas
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 tree Tom Lane
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Shaun Thomas
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 tree Tom Lane
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Shaun Thomas
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Shaun Thomas
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Tom Lane
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Shaun Thomas
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Tom Lane
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Tom Lane
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim Nasby
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Tom Lane
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
• Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 tree Marcin Mank
• OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Antoine
• Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Jim C. Nasby
• Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Tom Lane
• Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Greg Stark
• Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Antoine
• Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Tom Lane
• Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Antoine
• Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Dave Dutcher
• 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Anthony Presley
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Josh Berkus
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? David Boreham
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Jim C. Nasby
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Steve Atkins
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Joshua D. Drake
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Steve Atkins
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Luke Lonergan
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Alex Turner
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Tom Lane
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? David Wheeler
• Placement of 64-bit libraries (offtopic) Steinar H. Gunderson
• Re: Placement of 64-bit libraries (offtopic) Stephen Frost
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Christopher Browne
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Leigh Dyer
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Josh Berkus
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Andreas Pflug
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? PFC
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Nis Jorgensen
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Christopher Browne
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Sven Geisler
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Luke Lonergan
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Sven Geisler
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Luke Lonergan
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Sven Geisler
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Luke Lonergan
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Sven Geisler
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Tom Lane
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Stephen Frost
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? mark
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Luke Lonergan
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Jim C. Nasby
• Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mischa Sandberg
• Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Tom Lane
• Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Michael Fuhr
• Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mischa Sandberg
• Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Tom Lane
• Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mischa Sandberg
• Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Jim C. Nasby
• Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mischa Sandberg
• Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Jim C. Nasby
• Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mischa Sandberg
• Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Jim C. Nasby
• Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Josh Berkus
• Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Joshua D. Drake
• Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mark Kirkwood
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Bill Moran
• Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Christopher Browne
• Posrgres speed problem Ruben Rubio Rey
• Re: Posrgres speed problem Dave Dutcher
• Message not available
  • Re: Posrgres speed problem Ruben Rubio Rey
  • Re: Posrgres speed problem Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Posrgres speed problem Ruben Rubio Rey
  • Re: Posrgres speed problem Jim C. Nasby
• Message not available
  • Re: Posrgres speed problem Ruben Rubio Rey
• Re: Posrgres speed problem Michael Fuhr
• Re: Posrgres speed problem Jim C. Nasby
• Re: Posrgres speed problem Ruben Rubio Rey
• Re: Posrgres speed problem Sven Geisler
• Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved? Ruben Rubio Rey
• Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved? Guido Neitzer
• Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved? Ruben Rubio Rey
• Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved! Ruben Rubio Rey
• Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved! Guido Neitzer
• function not called if part of aggregate Craig A. James
• Re: function not called if part of aggregate Steinar H. Gunderson
• Re: function not called if part of aggregate Tom Lane
• Re: function not called if part of aggregate Jim C. Nasby
• Re: function not called if part of aggregate Greg Stark
• Re: function not called if part of aggregate Craig A. James
• Re: function not called if part of aggregate Tom Lane
• explain analyze reports 20x more time than actual Craig A. James
• Re: explain analyze reports 20x more time than actual Tom Lane
• Variation between query runtimes John Top-k apad

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc