Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp
- From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
- To: Dan Gorman <dgorman(at)hi5(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 17:53:24 -0400
- Message-id: <20060614175324(dot)a3f9ffb4(dot)darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:48:04 -0700
Dan Gorman <dgorman(at)hi5(dot)com> wrote:
> If I have a pg database attached to a powervault (PV) with just an
> off-the-shelf SCSI card I generally want fsync on to prevent data
> corruption in case the PV should loose power.
> However, if I have it attached to a NetApp that ensures data writes
> to via the NVRAM can I safely turn fsync off to gain additional
> performance?
I wouldn't. Remember, you still have to get the data to the NetApp.
You don't want things sitting in the computer's buffers when it's power
goes down.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index