• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-cygwin
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-interfaces
    • pgsql-jdbc
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-odbc
    • pgsql -performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-ports
    • pgsql-sql
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Project lists
  • User groups
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• In The Real World
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News

pgsql-performance 2006-06 Chronological Index (2/3)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• 15 June 2006
  • Re: Optimizer internals John Vincent
  • Re: Optimizer internals Mark Lewis
  • Re: Optimizer internals John Vincent
  • Re: Optimizer internals Mark Lewis
  • Re: Precomputed constants? Zoltan Boszormenyi
  • Optimizer internals John Vincent
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? Bill Moran
  • Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Vivek Khera
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? Dan Harris
  • Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? Bruce Momjian
  • Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Steve Poe
  • Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? Mark Lewis
  • Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Vivek Khera
  • Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? Tom Lane
  • Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? jody brownell
  • Re: Precomputed constants? Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? Tom Lane
  • Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? Tom Lane
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? Chris Browne
  • Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? jody brownell
  • Re: How to analyze function performance Tom Lane
  • Re: How to analyze function performance Tomas Vondra
  • How to analyze function performance Mindaugas
  • Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? jody brownell
  • Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? jody brownell
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? Nis Jorgensen
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? kah_hang_ang
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? A. Kretschmer
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? kah_hang_ang
  • Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? A. Kretschmer
  • Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Dan Gorman
  • Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? kah_hang_ang
  • Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Joe Conway
  • Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Jonah H. Harris
  • Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Jonah H. Harris
  • Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Dan Gorman
  • Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Jonah H. Harris
  • Re: Precomputed constants? Zoltan Boszormenyi
  • Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Greg Stark
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Tom Lane
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim Nasby
• 14 June 2006
  • Re: Effects of cascading references in foreign keys Bruce Momjian
  • Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Mark Lewis
  • Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp D'Arcy J.M. Cain
  • Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp Dan Gorman
  • Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Josh Berkus
  • Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 John Vincent
  • Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 John Vincent
  • Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 Scott Marlowe
  • Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 John Vincent
  • Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 Scott Marlowe
  • Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? Tom Lane
  • Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Dave Page
  • Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Scott Marlowe
  • Postgres consuming way too much memory??? jody brownell
  • Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Antoine
  • Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Dave Page
  • Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 John Vincent
  • Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 A.M.
  • Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 John Vincent
  • Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Scott Marlowe
  • Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mischa Sandberg
  • Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 Scott Marlowe
  • Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 Tom Lane
  • Re: Precomputed constants? Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: how to partition disks Jim C. Nasby
  • Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 John E. Vincent
  • Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Steve Poe
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Shaun Thomas
  • Re: how to partition disks Sven Geisler
  • Re: how to partition disks Richard Broersma Jr
  • Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Tom Lane
  • Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Dave Dutcher
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: how to partition disks Sven Geisler
  • Re: Precomputed constants? Böszörményi Zoltán
  • Re: how to partition disks hubert depesz lubaczewski
  • Re: Precomputed constants? Volkan YAZICI
  • Precomputed constants? Böszörményi Zoltán
  • Re: how to partition disks Sven Geisler
  • how to partition disks hubert depesz lubaczewski
  • Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Antoine
  • Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Greg Stark
  • Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Tom Lane
  • Re: scaling up postgres Tom Lane
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Tom Lane
  • Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Tom Lane
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Tom Lane
  • Re: scaling up postgres John Vincent
  • Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mark Kirkwood
• 13 June 2006
  • Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mischa Sandberg
  • Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mischa Sandberg
  • Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mischa Sandberg
  • Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Joshua D. Drake
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: scaling up postgres Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Shaun Thomas
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Michael Fuhr
  • Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Tom Lane
  • Re: scaling up postgres John Vincent
  • Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mischa Sandberg
  • Re: scaling up postgres Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Tom Lane
  • Re: scaling up postgres Zydoon
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: scaling up postgres John Vincent
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Shaun Thomas
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: scaling up postgres Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 tree Tom Lane
  • Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Shaun Thomas
  • Re: scaling up postgres PFC
  • Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Dave Page
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Joshua D. Drake
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: scaling up postgres Gavin Hamill
  • Re: scaling up postgres Scott Marlowe
  • Re: scaling up postgres Jim C. Nasby
  • Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Bruce Momjian
  • Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? David Boreham
  • Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Chris Browne
  • Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Scott Marlowe
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 tree Marcin Mank
  • Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 tree Tom Lane
  • Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Steve Poe
  • Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 tree Shaun Thomas
  • Re: Placement of 64-bit libraries (offtopic) Stephen Frost
  • Re: function not called if part of aggregate Tom Lane
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Andreas Pflug
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Sven Geisler
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Luke Lonergan
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Sven Geisler
  • OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Antoine
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Luke Lonergan
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Christopher Browne
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Sven Geisler
  • Re: Interesting slow query PFC
  • Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved! Guido Neitzer
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Luke Lonergan
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? PFC
  • Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved! Ruben Rubio Rey
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Sven Geisler
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Nis Jorgensen
  • Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved? Ruben Rubio Rey
  • Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved? Guido Neitzer
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved? Ruben Rubio Rey
  • Re: Posrgres speed problem Ruben Rubio Rey
  • Placement of 64-bit libraries (offtopic) Steinar H. Gunderson
  • Re: function not called if part of aggregate Craig A. James
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Josh Berkus
  • Re: scaling up postgres Zydoon
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Leigh Dyer
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? David Wheeler
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Luke Lonergan
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Christopher Browne
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Tom Lane
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Christopher Browne
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Alex Turner
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? mark
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Luke Lonergan
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Steve Atkins
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Joshua D. Drake
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Bill Moran
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Stephen Frost
• 12 June 2006
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Tom Lane
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Steve Atkins
  • Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? David Boreham

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]