Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
- From: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
- To: Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:11:42 -0400
- Message-id: <3EF41DD8-1073-4EAC-B6D7-4A78BE7549F8@khera.org> <text/plain>
On Apr 25, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
Where I'm stuck is in deciding whether we want to go with dual-core pentiums with 2M cache, or with HT pentiums with 8M cache.
In order of preference: Opterons (dual core or single core) Xeon with HT *disabled* at the BIOS level (dual or single core) Notice Xeon with HT is not on my list :-)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
- From: Sven Geisler
- Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
- References:
- Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
- From: Bill Moran
- Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
- Prev by Date: Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync
- Next by Date: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
- Previous by thread: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
- Next by thread: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
- Indexes: