Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync OFF for postgresql
- From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
- To: guoping(dot)zhang(at)nec(dot)com(dot)au
- Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Guoping Zhang (E-mail)" <guopingz(at)nstc(dot)nec(dot)com(dot)au>
- Subject: Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync OFF for postgresql
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:26:18 +0200
Guoping, On 4/27/06, Guoping Zhang <guoping(dot)zhang(at)nec(dot)com(dot)au> wrote: > We have to looking at setting fsync OFF option for performance reason, Did you try the other wal sync methods (fdatasync in particular)? I saw a few posts lately explaining how changing sync method can affect performances in specific cases. -- Guillaume
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync OFF for postgresql
- From: Guoping Zhang
- Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync OFF for postgresql
- References:
- how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync OFF for postgresql
- From: Guoping Zhang
- how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync OFF for postgresql
- Prev by Date: Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync OFF for postgresql
- Next by Date: Re: Introducing a new linux readahead framework
- Previous by thread: Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync
- Next by thread: Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync OFF for postgresql
- Indexes: