Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Performance decrease
- From: "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
- To: Radovan Antloga <radovan(dot)antloga(at)siol(dot)net>
- Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Performance decrease
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:00:07 -0500
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 06:10:21PM +0200, Radovan Antloga wrote: > I have once or twice a month update on many records (~6000) but > not so many. I did not expect PG would have problems with > updating 15800 records. And generally speaking, it doesn't. But you do need to ensure that you're vacuuming the database frequently enough. Autovacuum is a good way to do that. > My test was on Windows XP SP2. > I have AMD 64 2.1 GHz cpu with > 1GB ram. One think to keep in mind is that the windows code is rather new, so it is possible to find some performance issues there. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
- References:
- Performance decrease
- From: Radovan Antloga
- Re: Performance decrease
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Performance decrease
- From: Radovan Antloga
- Performance decrease
- Prev by Date: Re: Quick Performance Poll
- Next by Date: Slow deletes in 8.1 when FKs are involved
- Previous by thread: Re: Performance decrease
- Next by thread: Re: Performance decrease
- Indexes: