Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Inserts optimization?
- From: Gábriel Ákos <akos(dot)gabriel(at)i-logic(dot)hu>
- To: Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com>
- Cc: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Inserts optimization?
- Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:32:56 +0200
Francisco Reyes wrote:
That is certainly something worth considering... Still I wonder if 2 more spindles will help enough to justify going to RAID 5. My understanding is that RAID10 has simpler computations requirements which is partly what makes it better for lots of random read/write.
you are right. raid5 is definitely not suitable for database activities. it is good for file servers, though. -- Üdvözlettel, Gábriel Ákos -=E-Mail :akos(dot)gabriel(at)i-logic(dot)hu|Web: http://www.i-logic.hu=- -=Tel/fax:+3612367353 |Mobil:+36209278894 =-
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Inserts optimization?
- From: Francisco Reyes
- Re: Inserts optimization?
- References:
- Inserts optimization?
- From: Francisco Reyes
- Re: Inserts optimization?
- From: Chris
- Re: Inserts optimization?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Inserts optimization?
- From: Francisco Reyes
- Re: Inserts optimization?
- From: Jim C. Nasby
- Re: Inserts optimization?
- From: Francisco Reyes
- Re: Inserts optimization?
- From: Michael Stone
- Re: Inserts optimization?
- From: Francisco Reyes
- Inserts optimization?
- Prev by Date: Re: Inserts optimization?
- Next by Date: Re: Inserts optimization?
- Previous by thread: Re: Inserts optimization?
- Next by thread: Re: Inserts optimization?
- Indexes: