Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search for
  Advanced Search

Re: Inserts optimization?


  • From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
  • To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
  • Subject: Re: Inserts optimization?
  • Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:49:14 -0400
  • Message-id: <20060414114911(dot)GG32678(at)mathom(dot)us>

On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 02:59:23PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
In RAID 10 would it matter that WALL is in the same RAID set?
Would it be better:
4 disks in RAID10 Data
2 disks RAID 1 WALL
2 hot spares

I guess the first question is why 2 hot spares? You don't have many spindles, so you don't want to waste them. It might turn out that a larger array with more spindles with outperform a smaller one with fewer, regardless of RAID level (assuming a decent battery-backed cache). You might try 5 RAID5
2 RAID1
1 spare

Mike Stone



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | PostgreSQL Archives hosted by Command Prompt, Inc. | Designed by tinysofa
Copyright © 1996 – 2008 PostgreSQL Global Development Group