Re: Index scan startup time

["Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>]

On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 07:42:53AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> Yes. And the estimates are bad enough (orders of magnitude) that I can't 
> help but wonder whether pg could come up with a better plan with better 
> statistics:
> 
>>>>>  ->  Index Scan using activity_pk on activity  (cost=0.00..40717259.91 
>>>>>  rows=6538650 width=8) (actual time=207356.050..207356.722 rows=100 
>>>>>  loops=1) Filter: ((state = 10000) OR (state = 10001))

Isn't the rows=100 here because of the LIMIT?

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/