Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance
- From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Ron <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>
- Cc: Mikael Carneholm <Mikael(dot)Carneholm(at)WirelessCar(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:20:38 -0400
Ron wrote: > IIRC, Josh Berkus did some benches that suggests in pg 8.x a value of > 64 - 256 is best for checkpoint_segments as long as you have the RAM > available. I think you are confusing checkpoint_segments with wal_buffers. checkpoint_segments certainly has little to do with available RAM! -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
- References:
- Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance optimization
- From: Mikael Carneholm
- Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance
- From: Simon Riggs
- Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance
- From: Ron
- Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance optimization
- Prev by Date: Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance
- Next by Date: Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance
- Previous by thread: Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance
- Next by thread: Query Feromance
- Indexes: