Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: neverending vacuum
- From: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>
- To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- Cc: postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: neverending vacuum
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:03:40 +0100
> So one very effective way of speeding this process up is giving the > vacuum process lots of memory, because it will have to do fewer passes > at each index. How much do you have? OK, this is my problem... it is left at default (16 megabyte ?). This must be a mistake in configuration, on other similar boxes I set this to 262144 (256 megabyte). The box has 4 Gbyte memory. Thanks for the explanation - you were right on the spot, it will likely solve the problem. Cheers, Csaba.
- References:
- neverending vacuum
- From: Csaba Nagy
- Re: neverending vacuum
- From: Alvaro Herrera
- neverending vacuum
- Prev by Date: Large Table With Only a Few Rows
- Next by Date: The trigger can be specified to fire on time condition?
- Previous by thread: Re: neverending vacuum
- Next by thread: Large Table With Only a Few Rows
- Indexes: