Skip site navigation
(1)
Skip section navigation
(2)
Search
Peripheral Links
Text Size:
Normal
/
Large
Donate
Contact
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Home
About
Downloads
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Section Navigation
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
Subscribe
User lists
pgsql-admin
pgsql-advocacy
pgsql-announce
pgsql-bugs
pgsql-docs
pgsql-general
pgsql-jobs
pgsql-novice
pgsql-performance
pgsql-php
pgsql-sql
pgsql-students
Developer lists
Regional lists
Associations
User groups
Project lists
Inactive lists
IRC
Featured Users
International Sites
Propaganda
Resources
Weekly News
Community login
Profile
Lost password
Search archives
Advanced Search
pgsql-performance 2005-12 Thread Index (3/4)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 04:19:26 2012
659 messages
Main Index
[
Prev Page
]
[
Next Page
]
Re: opinion on disk speed
,
(continued)
Re: opinion on disk speed
Vivek Khera (Mon 12 22:19)
Re: opinion on disk speed
Scott Marlowe (Mon 12 23:12)
Re: opinion on disk speed
J. Andrew Rogers (Mon 12 23:17)
Re: opinion on disk speed
David Lang (Fri 09 02:30)
Re: opinion on disk speed
Dave Page (Thu 08 17:03)
Re: opinion on disk speed
Frank Wiles (Fri 09 15:46)
Re: opinion on disk speed
Andreas Pflug (Fri 09 15:50)
Re: opinion on disk speed
Vivek Khera (Mon 12 18:42)
Re: opinion on disk speed
Jeremy Haile (Fri 09 14:15)
Re: opinion on disk speed
Frank Wiles (Fri 09 15:57)
Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex multidimensional query?
Pål Stenslet (Thu 08 14:40)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex multidimensional query?
Tom Lane (Sun 11 20:38)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Simon Riggs (Tue 13 23:28)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Bruce Momjian (Sat 17 04:28)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Mark Kirkwood (Sat 17 05:21)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Simon Riggs (Sat 17 09:15)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Bruce Momjian (Sat 17 16:43)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Tom Lane (Sat 17 18:35)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Bruce Momjian (Sat 17 19:04)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Tom Lane (Sat 17 18:13)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Tom Lane (Sat 17 18:47)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Luke Lonergan (Sat 17 19:05)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Mark Kirkwood (Sun 18 02:02)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Simon Riggs (Sun 18 10:27)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Mark Kirkwood (Sun 18 22:10)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Simon Riggs (Sun 18 22:21)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Mark Kirkwood (Sun 18 04:07)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Simon Riggs (Sun 18 17:54)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Mark Kirkwood (Sun 18 22:04)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Greg Stark (Sun 18 06:50)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Simon Riggs (Sun 18 13:48)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Mark Kirkwood (Sun 18 22:13)
Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Simon Riggs (Sun 18 22:28)
Disk tests for a new database server
Rory Campbell-Lange (Thu 08 12:14)
Re: Disk tests for a new database server
Steve Poe (Thu 08 18:17)
Re: Disk tests for a new database server
Rory Campbell-Lange (Thu 08 22:55)
INSERTs becoming slower and slower
Nörder-Tuitje, Marcus (Thu 08 08:36)
Re: INSERTs becoming slower and slower
Christopher Kings-Lynne (Thu 08 08:40)
Re: INSERTs becoming slower and slower
Matteo Beccati (Thu 08 14:07)
view of view
Keith Worthington (Thu 08 03:21)
Re: view of view
Rich Doughty (Thu 08 13:46)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: view of view
Merlin Moncure (Thu 08 13:13)
First query is slow, subsequent queries fast
Stephan Vollmer (Wed 07 10:46)
Re: First query is slow, subsequent queries fast
Oleg Bartunov (Wed 07 10:55)
Re: First query is slow, subsequent queries fast
Stephan Vollmer (Wed 07 18:33)
table partitioning: effects of many sub-tables (was COPY too slow...)
Rick Schumeyer (Wed 07 09:31)
Re: Effects of cascading references in foreign keys
Bruce Momjian (Wed 07 04:41)
Context switching and Xeon processors
Brandon Metcalf (Tue 06 21:19)
Re: Context switching and Xeon processors
Tom Lane (Tue 06 21:36)
Re: Context switching and Xeon processors
Brandon Metcalf (Tue 06 21:45)
Re: Context switching and Xeon processors
Steinar H. Gunderson (Tue 06 21:52)
Join the same row
Edison Azzi (Tue 06 20:23)
Re: Join the same row
Richard Huxton (Wed 07 09:27)
Re: Join the same row
Edison Azzi (Wed 07 18:45)
Re: Join the same row
Richard Huxton (Wed 07 19:02)
Re: Join the same row
Tom Lane (Sun 11 20:36)
Re: High context switches occurring
Anjan Dave (Tue 06 19:04)
Re: High context switches occurring
Vivek Khera (Tue 06 19:25)
Re: High context switches occurring
Tom Lane (Tue 06 23:45)
Re: High context switches occurring
Bruce Momjian (Wed 07 04:34)
Re: High context switches occurring
Tom Lane (Wed 07 04:49)
Re: High context switches occurring
Tatsuo Ishii (Wed 07 07:26)
Re: High context switches occurring
Scott Marlowe (Wed 07 16:24)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: High context switches occurring
Anjan Dave (Wed 07 15:54)
Re: High context switches occurring
Anjan Dave (Tue 20 02:08)
Re: High context switches occurring
Juan Casero (Tue 20 04:10)
Re: High context switches occurring
Oleg Bartunov (Tue 20 05:26)
Re: High context switches occurring
Jignesh K. Shah (Tue 20 06:53)
Re: High context switches occurring
Tom Lane (Tue 20 14:41)
Re: High context switches occurring
Oleg Bartunov (Tue 20 15:18)
Re: High context switches occurring
Tom Lane (Tue 20 15:28)
Re: High context switches occurring
Anjan Dave (Tue 20 19:50)
postgresql performance tuning
Ameet Kini (Tue 06 17:44)
Re: postgresql performance tuning
Tom Lane (Tue 06 18:03)
Re: postgresql performance tuning
Vivek Khera (Tue 06 18:33)
Re: postgresql performance tuning
Michael Riess (Tue 06 21:02)
<Possible follow-ups>
postgresql performance tuning
Ameet Kini (Tue 06 19:20)
Re: postgresql performance tuning
Vivek Khera (Tue 06 20:07)
Re: postgresql performance tuning
Alan Stange (Tue 06 20:49)
Re: postgresql performance tuning
Tom Lane (Tue 06 21:20)
Re: postgresql performance tuning
Alan Stange (Tue 06 21:40)
Re: postgresql performance tuning
Ameet Kini (Tue 06 22:03)
Re: postgresql performance tuning
Michael Stone (Wed 07 00:23)
Re: postgresql performance tuning
Vivek Khera (Wed 07 15:50)
slow COMMITs
Evgeny Gridasov (Thu 08 17:09)
TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
Joshua Kramer (Tue 06 16:48)
Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
Michael Riess (Tue 06 16:59)
Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
Oleg Bartunov (Tue 06 17:14)
Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
Bruce Momjian (Tue 06 17:27)
Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
Tom Lane (Tue 06 18:02)
Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
Michael Riess (Tue 06 18:28)
Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
Bruce Momjian (Tue 06 18:32)
Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
Christopher Kings-Lynne (Wed 07 01:38)
Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
Michael Riess (Wed 07 07:56)
Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
Christopher Kings-Lynne (Wed 07 08:17)
Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
Michael Riess (Wed 07 08:28)
Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
Russell Garrett (Tue 06 20:35)
Re: 8.1 count(*) distinct: IndexScan/SeqScan
Pailloncy Jean-Gerard (Tue 06 16:19)
Can this query go faster???
Joost Kraaijeveld (Tue 06 09:43)
Re: Can this query go faster???
Michael Riess (Tue 06 09:51)
Re: Can this query go faster???
Csaba Nagy (Tue 06 09:54)
Re: Can this query go faster???
Joost Kraaijeveld (Tue 06 10:21)
Re: Can this query go faster???
Tino Wildenhain (Tue 06 10:32)
Re: Can this query go faster???
Joost Kraaijeveld (Tue 06 11:21)
Re: Can this query go faster???
Tino Wildenhain (Tue 06 11:36)
Re: Can this query go faster???
Joost Kraaijeveld (Tue 06 12:20)
Re: Can this query go faster???
Tino Wildenhain (Tue 06 12:30)
Re: Can this query go faster???
Csaba Nagy (Tue 06 12:42)
Re: Can this query go faster???
Bruno Wolff III (Tue 06 20:46)
Re: Can this query go faster???
Ron (Tue 06 13:41)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Can this query go faster???
Markus Wollny (Tue 06 09:55)
Re: Can this query go faster???
Merlin Moncure (Tue 06 13:58)
need help (not anymore)
Jenny (Tue 06 09:41)
LVM and Postgres
Rory Campbell-Lange (Tue 06 09:39)
Re: LVM and Postgres
August Zajonc (Tue 06 20:12)
Re: LVM and Postgres
Rory Campbell-Lange (Tue 06 21:36)
Re: LVM and Postgres
Michael Stone (Wed 07 00:25)
Re: LVM and Postgres
Alex Turner (Wed 07 00:52)
Re: LVM and Postgres
Michael Stone (Wed 07 01:31)
Re: LVM and Postgres
Kevin Brown (Wed 07 04:14)
Re: LVM and Postgres
Rory Campbell-Lange (Thu 08 11:30)
Memory Leakage Problem
Kathy Lo (Tue 06 09:22)
Re: Memory Leakage Problem
Tom Lane (Tue 06 14:45)
Re: Memory Leakage Problem
Scott Marlowe (Tue 06 17:48)
need help
Jenny (Tue 06 08:45)
Re: [GENERAL] need help
Tino Wildenhain (Tue 06 08:54)
Re: [GENERAL] need help
Alban Medici \(NetCentrex\) (Wed 21 11:25)
Missed index opportunity for outer join?
rm_pg (Mon 05 22:11)
Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join?
Tom Lane (Mon 05 22:38)
Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join?
rm_pg (Mon 05 23:04)
Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join?
Tom Lane (Tue 06 16:57)
Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join?
Ron Mayer (Tue 06 20:11)
Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join?
Tom Lane (Tue 06 20:33)
Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join?
Ron Mayer (Tue 06 21:08)
Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join?
Tom Lane (Tue 06 21:25)
Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join?
Ron Mayer (Tue 06 21:35)
Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's
Assaf Yaari (Mon 05 20:17)
Re: Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's
Bruno Wolff III (Mon 05 20:31)
Re: Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's
Pandurangan R S (Tue 06 09:52)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's
Assaf Yaari (Tue 06 09:07)
Re: Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's
Jan Wieck (Tue 06 12:35)
Re: Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's
Bruno Wolff III (Tue 06 20:40)
Re: Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's
Assaf Yaari (Wed 07 12:14)
Re: Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's
Bruno Wolff III (Wed 07 20:00)
Re: Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's
Assaf Yaari (Thu 08 14:29)
Re: Best hardware
Mirjam (sent by Nabble.com) (Mon 05 19:27)
BLCKSZ
Olleg Samoylov (Mon 05 13:47)
Re: BLCKSZ
Tom Lane (Mon 05 15:02)
Re: BLCKSZ
Olleg (Mon 05 22:32)
Re: BLCKSZ
Alvaro Herrera (Tue 06 00:07)
Re: BLCKSZ
Ron (Tue 06 01:21)
Re: BLCKSZ
Tom Lane (Tue 06 05:51)
Re: BLCKSZ
Olleg (Tue 06 10:40)
Re: BLCKSZ
Steinar H. Gunderson (Tue 06 10:59)
Re: BLCKSZ
David Lang (Tue 06 11:42)
Query Fails with error calloc - Cannot alocate memory
Howard Oblowitz (Mon 05 07:56)
Re: Query Fails with error calloc - Cannot alocate memory
Christopher Kings-Lynne (Wed 07 04:15)
Re: Query Fails with error calloc - Cannot alocate memory
Neil Conway (Wed 07 06:23)
Dividing up a single 250GB RAID10 server for postgres
Rory Campbell-Lange (Mon 05 03:19)
Re: Very slow queries - please help
Thomas F. O'Connell (Sun 04 06:40)
Re: Very slow queries - please help
Bealach-na Bo (Mon 12 16:24)
Faster db architecture for a twisted table.
Rodrigo Madera (Sat 03 23:00)
Re: Faster db architecture for a twisted table.
Andreas Pflug (Sun 04 00:00)
Re: Faster db architecture for a twisted table.
Hélder M . Vieira (Sun 04 01:33)
Re: Faster db architecture for a twisted table.
Andreas Pflug (Sun 04 11:56)
Re: Faster db architecture for a twisted table.
Mitchell Skinner (Sun 04 00:09)
Re: Faster db architecture for a twisted table.
Klint Gore (Sun 04 22:19)
Small table or partial index?
Francisco Reyes (Fri 02 23:26)
Re: Small table or partial index?
Jim C. Nasby (Mon 12 22:24)
Re: Small table or partial index?
Francisco Reyes (Tue 13 16:08)
15,000 tables - next step
Michael Riess (Fri 02 23:02)
Re: 15,000 tables - next step
Jan Wieck (Sat 03 15:51)
Re: 15,000 tables - next step
Michael Riess (Sat 03 16:20)
Re: 15,000 tables - next step
Alvaro Herrera (Sat 03 16:26)
Re: 15,000 tables - next step
Michael Riess (Sat 03 16:41)
Re: 15,000 tables - next step
Jaime Casanova (Sat 03 18:45)
Re: 15,000 tables - next step
Jan Wieck (Sat 03 19:32)
Re: 15,000 tables - next step
William Yu (Sun 04 09:21)
Re: 15,000 tables - next step
Michael Riess (Sun 04 09:33)
Re: 15,000 tables - next step
Jan Wieck (Tue 06 03:07)
Main Index
[
Prev Page
]
[
Next Page
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc
Privacy Policy
|
About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996 – 2012 PostgreSQL Global Development Group