• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-sql
    • pgsql-students
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-performance 2005-02 Thread Index (1/3)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• [no subject] Unknown (Wed 18 04:20)
• Inheritence versus delete from Sven Willenberger (Mon 28 23:58)
• wal_sync_methods Stefan Hans (Mon 28 21:24)
• PG block sizes Tom Arthurs (Sun 27 22:32)
• PostgreSQL 7.4.3 Performance issues on OpenBSD Glenn Kusardi (Sat 26 14:04)
• Possible interesting extra information for explain analyze? Jeff (Fri 25 13:47)
• Re: Possible interesting extra information for explain analyze? Tom Lane (Fri 25 16:04)
• Re: Possible interesting extra information for explain Simon Riggs (Sun 27 20:31)
• IS NULL vs IS NOT NULL Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2) (Fri 25 10:10)
• Re: IS NULL vs IS NOT NULL Stephan Szabo (Fri 25 14:55)
• gah! sudden slowdown?? SpaceBallOne (Fri 25 07:41)
• Re: gah! sudden slowdown?? Steinar H. Gunderson (Fri 25 11:19)
• Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Allgood (Wed 23 16:39)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Michael Adler (Wed 23 18:03)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Bruno Almeida do Lago (Wed 23 18:25)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Rod Taylor (Wed 23 18:36)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Tom Lane (Wed 23 18:51)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Tom Lane (Wed 23 18:37)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Allgood (Wed 23 19:16)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Arbash Meinel (Wed 23 19:46)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Allgood (Wed 23 20:05)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Arbash Meinel (Wed 23 20:25)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Allgood (Wed 23 20:42)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Arbash Meinel (Wed 23 21:02)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Michael Adler (Wed 23 19:51)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Jim C. Nasby (Fri 25 16:19)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Josh Berkus (Wed 23 20:58)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Bruno Almeida do Lago (Thu 24 13:27)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Christopher Browne (Thu 24 03:50)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2) (Thu 24 08:28)
• Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Allgood (Thu 24 18:31)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Joel Fradkin (Thu 24 19:08)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Arbash Meinel (Thu 24 19:40)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Markus Schaber (Mon 28 08:10)
• Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2) (Fri 25 11:19)
• Joins, Deletes and Indexes Butkus_Charles (Wed 23 01:45)
• Re: Joins, Deletes and Indexes Richard Huxton (Wed 23 08:39)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Joins, Deletes and Indexes Butkus_Charles (Wed 23 13:06)
• Re: Joins, Deletes and Indexes Richard Huxton (Wed 23 13:42)
• Inefficient Query Plans Luke Chambers (Tue 22 22:08)
• Re: Inefficient Query Plans Tom Lane (Wed 23 16:44)
• is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola (Tue 22 19:48)
• Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Matthew T. O'Connor (Tue 22 20:56)
• Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola (Wed 23 01:05)
• Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Christopher Browne (Wed 23 06:04)
• Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Tom Lane (Tue 22 21:28)
• Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola (Wed 23 01:03)
• Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Christopher Browne (Wed 23 06:04)
• Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola (Wed 23 16:31)
• Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Matthew T. O'Connor (Wed 23 19:16)
• Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola (Thu 24 10:59)
• Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Markus Schaber (Thu 24 12:13)
• Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola (Thu 24 22:30)
• Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Markus Schaber (Fri 25 17:54)
• Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Matthew T. O'Connor (Mon 28 14:31)
• Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Markus Schaber (Mon 28 15:46)
• Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Bruno Wolff III (Mon 28 18:22)
• PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2) (Tue 22 14:58)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2) (Tue 22 15:01)
• Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Mitch Pirtle (Tue 22 16:30)
• Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Magnus Hagander (Tue 22 18:15)
• Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Neil Conway (Wed 23 05:00)
• Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Markus Schaber (Wed 23 14:38)
• Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2) (Wed 23 10:41)
• Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Magnus Hagander (Wed 23 14:50)
• Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Magnus Hagander (Wed 23 14:54)
• Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Neil Conway (Wed 23 22:36)
• Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Tom Lane (Wed 23 22:56)
• Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Bruce Momjian (Thu 24 21:25)
• Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Greg Stark (Fri 25 05:02)
• subquery vs join on 7.4.5 David Haas (Tue 22 07:05)
• Re: subquery vs join on 7.4.5 Tom Lane (Wed 23 16:54)
• join vs. subquery David Haas (Tue 22 06:48)
• Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function amrit (Sun 20 15:46)
• Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood (Sun 20 22:58)
• Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function amrit (Mon 21 01:32)
• Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood (Mon 21 21:16)
• Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood (Mon 21 21:51)
• Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function amrit (Tue 22 04:58)
• Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood (Tue 22 05:45)
• Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function amrit (Tue 22 15:34)
• Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood (Tue 22 20:07)
• Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function amrit (Wed 23 14:55)
• Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood (Wed 23 20:30)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function G u i d o B a r o s i o (Wed 23 17:50)
• bad performances using hashjoin Gaetano Mendola (Sun 20 12:25)
• Re: bad performances using hashjoin Tom Lane (Sun 20 18:46)
• Re: bad performances using hashjoin Gaetano Mendola (Mon 21 00:45)
• Re: bad performances using hashjoin Klint Gore (Mon 21 01:29)
• Re: bad performances using hashjoin Tom Lane (Mon 21 02:01)
• Re: bad performances using hashjoin Mischa (Mon 21 17:11)
• Re: bad performances using hashjoin David Brown (Mon 21 03:02)
• Re: bad performances using hashjoin Tom Lane (Mon 21 03:48)
• Re: bad performances using hashjoin Gaetano Mendola (Mon 21 11:18)
• Re: bad performances using hashjoin David Brown (Mon 21 14:03)
• Help me please ! Asatryan, Anahit (Sat 19 11:06)
• Re: Help me please ! Richard Huxton (Wed 23 08:29)
• Re: Help me please ! Markus Schaber (Wed 23 14:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question Merlin Moncure (Fri 18 15:11)
• Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Rodrigo Moreno (Fri 18 13:56)
• Re: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Steinar H. Gunderson (Fri 18 14:08)
• Re: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Tom Lane (Fri 18 14:32)
• Re: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Steinar H. Gunderson (Fri 18 14:40)
• RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Rodrigo Moreno (Fri 18 14:45)
• Re: RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Christopher Kings-Lynne (Fri 18 14:53)
• Re: RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Christopher Kings-Lynne (Fri 18 14:54)
• RES: RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Rodrigo Moreno (Sun 20 12:04)
• Re: RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Tom Lane (Fri 18 14:59)
• RES: RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Rodrigo Moreno (Fri 18 15:11)
• Effects of IDLE processes JM (Fri 18 10:15)
• Re: Effects of IDLE processes Tom Lane (Fri 18 14:16)
• Re: Effects of IDLE processes Gaetano Mendola (Mon 21 00:51)
• Re: Effects of IDLE processes Christopher Browne (Mon 21 03:50)
• Re: Effects of IDLE processes Gaetano Mendola (Mon 21 11:25)
• VACUUM ANALYZE slows down query werner fraga (Thu 17 22:24)
• Re: VACUUM ANALYZE slows down query John Arbash Meinel (Thu 17 22:38)
• Re: VACUUM ANALYZE slows down query Tom Lane (Thu 17 23:28)
• Re: VACUUM ANALYZE slows down query Tom Lane (Tue 22 23:08)
• PG proper configuation for a php forum JM (Thu 17 13:29)
• disagreeing query planners lcham02 (Tue 15 20:16)
• VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Michael Ryan S. Puncia (Tue 15 01:29)
• Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Iain (Tue 15 01:52)
• Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Michael Ryan S. Puncia (Tue 15 02:07)
• Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Iain (Tue 15 02:29)
• Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Tom Lane (Tue 15 05:32)
• Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Iain (Tue 15 05:55)
• Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM PFC (Tue 15 08:47)
• Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Rod Taylor (Tue 15 02:22)
• seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Mark Aufflick (Mon 14 23:34)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Iain (Tue 15 03:52)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Rod Taylor (Tue 15 04:21)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Iain (Tue 15 06:52)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Christopher Browne (Tue 15 05:50)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Greg Stark (Tue 15 07:07)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Tom Lane (Tue 15 07:36)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Greg Stark (Tue 15 08:11)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Josh Berkus (Tue 15 17:23)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Tom Lane (Tue 15 17:55)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Greg Stark (Tue 15 18:40)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Ron Mayer (Thu 17 03:14)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Merlin Moncure (Tue 15 14:48)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Christopher Browne (Tue 15 20:16)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Merlin Moncure (Tue 15 18:03)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Magnus Hagander (Tue 15 18:41)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown PFC (Tue 15 21:51)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Greg Stark (Wed 16 04:20)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Bruce Momjian (Sat 19 04:11)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Magnus Hagander (Sun 20 18:25)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Merlin Moncure (Mon 21 14:03)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Tom Lane (Mon 21 16:27)
• Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Ron Mayer (Tue 22 01:05)
• String matching Ivan Voras (Mon 14 19:57)
• Re: String matching PFC (Mon 14 20:05)
• Re: String matching Ivan Voras (Mon 14 20:32)
• Re: String matching Stephan Szabo (Mon 14 20:42)
• Re: String matching Ivan Voras (Mon 14 20:45)
• Re: String matching Stephan Szabo (Mon 14 22:12)
• Re: String matching Ivan Voras (Mon 14 22:29)
• Re: String matching Stephan Szabo (Mon 14 22:31)
• Autocommit Hasnul Fadhly bin Hasan (Mon 14 08:01)
• Re: Autocommit Michael Fuhr (Mon 14 08:47)
• Re: Autocommit Hasnul Fadhly bin Hasan (Mon 14 08:59)
• Re: Autocommit Michael Fuhr (Mon 14 09:34)
• estimated rows vs. actual rows Jaime Casanova (Sun 13 21:27)
• Re: estimated rows vs. actual rows Josh Berkus (Sun 13 21:42)
• Re: estimated rows vs. actual rows Jaime Casanova (Mon 14 03:18)
• Re: estimated rows vs. actual rows Tom Lane (Mon 14 03:38)
• Re: estimated rows vs. actual rows Mark Kirkwood (Mon 14 03:41)
• Re: estimated rows vs. actual rows Christopher Browne (Mon 14 12:48)
• How to interpret this explain analyse? Joost Kraaijeveld (Fri 11 09:19)
• Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Richard Huxton (Fri 11 10:20)
• Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Tom Lane (Fri 11 16:18)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Joost Kraaijeveld (Fri 11 19:25)
• Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Tom Lane (Fri 11 19:41)
• Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Kevin Brown (Tue 15 00:10)
• Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Greg Stark (Tue 15 07:40)
• Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Bricklen Anderson (Tue 15 15:12)
• Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Kevin Brown (Wed 16 21:09)
• Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Joost Kraaijeveld (Fri 11 23:12)
• Large time difference between explain analyze and normal run Chris Kratz (Thu 10 18:34)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc