• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-sql
    • pgsql-students
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-performance 2005-02 Chronological Index (1/3)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• 18 January 2012
  • [no subject] Unknown (04:20)
• 28 February 2005
  • Inheritence versus delete from Sven Willenberger (23:58)
  • Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Tom Lane (22:15)
  • Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Cosimo Streppone (21:47)
  • wal_sync_methods Stefan Hans (21:24)
  • Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Bruno Wolff III (18:22)
  • Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Markus Schaber (15:46)
  • Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Matthew T. O'Connor (14:31)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Markus Schaber (08:10)
• 27 February 2005
  • PG block sizes Tom Arthurs (22:32)
  • Re: Possible interesting extra information for explain Simon Riggs (20:31)
• 26 February 2005
  • PostgreSQL 7.4.3 Performance issues on OpenBSD Glenn Kusardi (14:04)
• 25 February 2005
  • Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Markus Schaber (17:54)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Jim C. Nasby (16:19)
  • Re: Possible interesting extra information for explain analyze? Tom Lane (16:04)
  • Re: IS NULL vs IS NOT NULL Stephan Szabo (14:55)
  • Possible interesting extra information for explain analyze? Jeff (13:47)
  • Re: gah! sudden slowdown?? Steinar H. Gunderson (11:19)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2) (11:19)
  • IS NULL vs IS NOT NULL Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2) (10:10)
  • gah! sudden slowdown?? SpaceBallOne (07:41)
  • Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Greg Stark (05:02)
• 24 February 2005
  • Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola (22:30)
  • Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Bruce Momjian (21:25)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Arbash Meinel (19:40)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Joel Fradkin (19:08)
  • Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Allgood (18:31)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Bruno Almeida do Lago (13:27)
  • Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Markus Schaber (12:13)
  • Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola (10:59)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2) (08:28)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Christopher Browne (03:50)
• 23 February 2005
  • Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Tom Lane (22:56)
  • Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Neil Conway (22:36)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Arbash Meinel (21:02)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Josh Berkus (20:58)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Allgood (20:42)
  • Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood (20:30)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Arbash Meinel (20:25)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Allgood (20:05)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Michael Adler (19:51)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Arbash Meinel (19:46)
  • Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Matthew T. O'Connor (19:16)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Allgood (19:16)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Tom Lane (18:51)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Tom Lane (18:37)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Rod Taylor (18:36)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Bruno Almeida do Lago (18:25)
  • Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Michael Adler (18:03)
  • Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function G u i d o B a r o s i o (17:50)
  • Re: subquery vs join on 7.4.5 Tom Lane (16:54)
  • Re: Inefficient Query Plans Tom Lane (16:44)
  • Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Allgood (16:39)
  • Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola (16:31)
  • Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function amrit (14:55)
  • Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Magnus Hagander (14:54)
  • Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Magnus Hagander (14:50)
  • Re: Help me please ! Markus Schaber (14:42)
  • Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Markus Schaber (14:38)
  • Re: Joins, Deletes and Indexes Richard Huxton (13:42)
  • Re: Joins, Deletes and Indexes Butkus_Charles (13:06)
  • Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2) (10:41)
  • Re: Joins, Deletes and Indexes Richard Huxton (08:39)
  • Re: Help me please ! Richard Huxton (08:29)
  • Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Christopher Browne (06:04)
  • Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Christopher Browne (06:04)
  • Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Neil Conway (05:00)
  • Joins, Deletes and Indexes Butkus_Charles (01:45)
  • Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola (01:05)
  • Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola (01:03)
• 22 February 2005
  • Re: VACUUM ANALYZE slows down query Tom Lane (23:08)
  • Inefficient Query Plans Luke Chambers (22:08)
  • Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Tom Lane (21:28)
  • Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Matthew T. O'Connor (20:56)
  • Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood (20:07)
  • is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola (19:48)
  • Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Magnus Hagander (18:15)
  • Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Mitch Pirtle (16:30)
  • Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function amrit (15:34)
  • PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2) (15:01)
  • PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2) (14:58)
  • subquery vs join on 7.4.5 David Haas (07:05)
  • join vs. subquery David Haas (06:48)
  • Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood (05:45)
  • Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function amrit (04:58)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Ron Mayer (01:05)
• 21 February 2005
  • Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood (21:51)
  • Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood (21:16)
  • Re: bad performances using hashjoin Mischa (17:11)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Tom Lane (16:27)
  • Re: bad performances using hashjoin David Brown (14:03)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Merlin Moncure (14:03)
  • Re: Effects of IDLE processes Gaetano Mendola (11:25)
  • Re: bad performances using hashjoin Gaetano Mendola (11:18)
  • Re: Effects of IDLE processes Christopher Browne (03:50)
  • Re: bad performances using hashjoin Tom Lane (03:48)
  • Re: bad performances using hashjoin David Brown (03:02)
  • Re: bad performances using hashjoin Tom Lane (02:01)
  • Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function amrit (01:32)
  • Re: bad performances using hashjoin Klint Gore (01:29)
  • Re: Effects of IDLE processes Gaetano Mendola (00:51)
  • Re: bad performances using hashjoin Gaetano Mendola (00:45)
• 20 February 2005
  • Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood (22:58)
  • Re: bad performances using hashjoin Tom Lane (18:46)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Magnus Hagander (18:25)
  • Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function amrit (15:46)
  • bad performances using hashjoin Gaetano Mendola (12:25)
  • RES: RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Rodrigo Moreno (12:04)
• 19 February 2005
  • Help me please ! Asatryan, Anahit (11:06)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Bruce Momjian (04:11)
• 18 February 2005
  • Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering Gaetano Mendola (23:27)
  • Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering Gaetano Mendola (23:25)
  • RES: RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Rodrigo Moreno (15:11)
  • Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question Merlin Moncure (15:11)
  • Re: RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Tom Lane (14:59)
  • Re: RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Christopher Kings-Lynne (14:54)
  • Re: RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Christopher Kings-Lynne (14:53)
  • RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Rodrigo Moreno (14:45)
  • Re: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Steinar H. Gunderson (14:40)
  • Re: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Tom Lane (14:32)
  • Re: Effects of IDLE processes Tom Lane (14:16)
  • Re: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Steinar H. Gunderson (14:08)
  • Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Rodrigo Moreno (13:56)
  • Effects of IDLE processes JM (10:15)
• 17 February 2005
  • Re: VACUUM ANALYZE slows down query Tom Lane (23:28)
  • Re: VACUUM ANALYZE slows down query John Arbash Meinel (22:38)
  • VACUUM ANALYZE slows down query werner fraga (22:24)
  • PG proper configuation for a php forum JM (13:29)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Ron Mayer (03:14)
• 16 February 2005
  • Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Kevin Brown (21:09)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Greg Stark (04:20)
• 15 February 2005
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown PFC (21:51)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Christopher Browne (20:16)
  • disagreeing query planners lcham02 (20:16)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Magnus Hagander (18:41)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Greg Stark (18:40)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Merlin Moncure (18:03)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Tom Lane (17:55)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Josh Berkus (17:23)
  • Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Bricklen Anderson (15:12)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Merlin Moncure (14:48)
  • Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM PFC (08:47)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Greg Stark (08:11)
  • Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Greg Stark (07:40)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Tom Lane (07:36)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Greg Stark (07:07)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Iain (06:52)
  • Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Iain (05:55)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Christopher Browne (05:50)
  • Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Tom Lane (05:32)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Rod Taylor (04:21)
  • Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Iain (03:52)
  • Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Iain (02:29)
  • Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Rod Taylor (02:22)
  • Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Michael Ryan S. Puncia (02:07)
  • Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Iain (01:52)
  • VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Michael Ryan S. Puncia (01:29)
  • Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Kevin Brown (00:10)
• 14 February 2005
  • seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Mark Aufflick (23:34)
  • Re: String matching Stephan Szabo (22:31)
  • Re: String matching Ivan Voras (22:29)
  • Re: String matching Stephan Szabo (22:12)
  • Re: String matching Ivan Voras (20:45)
  • Re: String matching Stephan Szabo (20:42)
  • Re: String matching Ivan Voras (20:32)
  • Re: String matching PFC (20:05)
  • String matching Ivan Voras (19:57)
  • Re: estimated rows vs. actual rows Christopher Browne (12:48)
  • Re: Benchmark Harald Fuchs (10:47)
  • Re: Autocommit Michael Fuhr (09:34)
  • Re: Autocommit Hasnul Fadhly bin Hasan (08:59)
  • Re: Autocommit Michael Fuhr (08:47)
  • Autocommit Hasnul Fadhly bin Hasan (08:01)
  • Re: estimated rows vs. actual rows Mark Kirkwood (03:41)
  • Re: estimated rows vs. actual rows Tom Lane (03:38)
  • Re: estimated rows vs. actual rows Jaime Casanova (03:18)
• 13 February 2005
  • Re: estimated rows vs. actual rows Josh Berkus (21:42)
  • estimated rows vs. actual rows Jaime Casanova (21:27)
  • Re: Benchmark Patrick Meylemans (19:25)
  • Re: Benchmark Greg Stark (16:35)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]