• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-sql
    • pgsql-students
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-performance 2003-05 Chronological Index (1/2)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• 18 January 2012
  • [no subject] Unknown (04:23)
  • [no subject] Unknown (04:23)
  • [no subject] Unknown (04:23)
• 01 June 2003
  • are views typically any faster/slower than equivilent joins? Brian Tarbox (02:52)
• 31 May 2003
  • Re: why Sequencial Scan when selecting on primary key of table? Tom Lane (18:12)
  • Re: why Sequencial Scan when selecting on primary key of table? Andrew Sullivan (18:02)
  • Re: why Sequencial Scan when selecting on primary key of table? Tom Lane (17:55)
  • Re: why Sequencial Scan when selecting on primary key of table? Rod Taylor (17:51)
  • Re: why Sequencial Scan when selecting on primary key of table? Brian Tarbox (17:43)
  • Re: why Sequencial Scan when selecting on primary key of table? Tom Lane (17:13)
  • Re: why Sequencial Scan when selecting on primary key of table? Andrew Sullivan (17:02)
  • why Sequencial Scan when selecting on primary key of table? Brian Tarbox (16:27)
  • Re: Enabling and Disabling Sequencial Scan Nikolaus Dilger (15:07)
  • Re: Enabling and Disabling Sequencial Scan Robert Creager (03:29)
  • Re: [GENERAL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Bruce Momjian (02:32)
• 30 May 2003
  • Re: Enabling and Disabling Sequencial Scan scott.marlowe (21:03)
  • Enabling and Disabling Sequencial Scan Yusuf (20:33)
  • Re: Table Relationships Josh Berkus (19:55)
  • Re: Hardware advice scott.marlowe (19:50)
  • Re: Hardware advice scott.marlowe (19:43)
  • Re: Hardware advice Will LaShell (19:15)
  • Re: Table Relationships Andrew Sullivan (18:18)
  • Re: Hardware advice Roman Fail (17:59)
  • Re: Table Relationships scott.marlowe (17:37)
  • Re: Hardware advice scott.marlowe (17:34)
  • Re: Table Relationships Josh Berkus (17:03)
  • Re: Hardware advice Adam Witney (16:57)
  • Re: Table Relationships Andrew Sullivan (16:39)
  • Spam sent to addresses subscribed to psql-performance pgsql-performance (16:30)
  • Re: Table Relationships Jeandre du Toit (16:22)
  • Re: Table Relationships Josh Berkus (16:07)
  • Re: Hardware advice scott.marlowe (15:42)
  • Re: Hardware advice Andrew Sullivan (14:44)
  • Re: Table Relationships Jeandre du Toit (14:31)
  • Hardware advice Adam Witney (14:25)
  • Re: Select query takes long to execute Bruno Wolff III (12:12)
  • Re: Table Relationships Bruno Wolff III (12:10)
  • Re: Table Relationships Victor Yegorov (10:08)
  • Table Relationships Jeandre du Toit (09:37)
  • Re: Select query takes long to execute SZUCS Gábor (08:59)
  • Re: Select query takes long to execute Nikolaus Dilger (02:44)
• 29 May 2003
  • Re: Select query takes long to execute scott.marlowe (16:18)
  • Re: Query problem fixed Tom Lane (14:49)
  • Re: Query problem fixed SZUCS Gábor (14:28)
  • Re: Select query takes long to execute Shridhar Daithankar (14:25)
  • Query problem fixed Kevin Schroeder (14:09)
  • Select query takes long to execute Kevin Schroeder (13:58)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Dave Tenny (12:48)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Bruno Wolff III (10:53)
  • Re: >24 hour restore Victor Yegorov (06:15)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:53)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:47)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Tom Lane (01:46)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Dave Tenny (01:19)
• 28 May 2003
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Tom Lane (23:44)
  • Re: Wildcard searches & performance question scott.marlowe (23:02)
  • recursive srf Matthew Nuzum (21:30)
  • Re: Wildcard searches & performance question Grega Bremec (20:52)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Bruno Wolff III (20:26)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Bruno Wolff III (20:22)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Dave Tenny (20:13)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Dave Tenny (20:01)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Dave Tenny (19:57)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Bruno Wolff III (18:39)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Bruno Wolff III (18:37)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Mario Weilguni (18:30)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Dave Tenny (18:17)
  • Re: >24 hour restore Andrew Sullivan (18:14)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Dave Tenny (18:08)
  • Re: >24 hour restore Chad Thompson (18:00)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Dave Tenny (17:58)
  • Re: >24 hour restore Andrew Sullivan (16:24)
  • Re: >24 hour restore scott.marlowe (16:12)
  • >24 hour restore Chad Thompson (15:46)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Stephan Szabo (14:54)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Mario Weilguni (14:31)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Andreas Pflug (13:19)
  • Re: IN list processing performance (yet again) Shridhar Daithankar (13:17)
  • IN list processing performance (yet again) Dave Tenny (12:51)
  • [no subject] Peter Lavender (11:28)
• 27 May 2003
  • Re: Wildcard searches & performance question Rod Taylor (20:06)
  • Re: Wildcard searches & performance question scott.marlowe (20:03)
  • Re: Wildcard searches & performance question Josh Berkus (19:56)
  • Re: Wildcard searches & performance question Andrew Sullivan (19:37)
  • Wildcard searches & performance question Grega Bremec (19:09)
• 23 May 2003
  • Re: [GENERAL] Q: Structured index - which one runs faster? Reece Hart (16:59)
  • Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron? scott.marlowe (16:50)
  • Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron? Shridhar Daithankar (14:38)
  • Re: [ADMIN] Q: Structured index - which one runs faster? Stephan Szabo (09:12)
  • Re: [ADMIN] Q: Structured index - which one runs faster? Ernest E Vogelsinger (01:47)
  • Re: [ADMIN] Q: Structured index - which one runs faster? Stephan Szabo (01:11)
  • Re: [ADMIN] Q: Structured index - which one runs faster? Tom Lane (01:03)
  • Re: [GENERAL] Q: Structured index - which one runs faster? scott.marlowe (00:45)
• 22 May 2003
  • Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron? Bruce Momjian (23:31)
  • Q: Structured index - which one runs faster? Ernest E Vogelsinger (22:17)
  • Re: ugly query slower in 7.3, even slower after vacuum full analyze SZŰCS Gábor (18:13)
  • Re: ugly query slower in 7.3, even slower after vacuum full analyze Josh Berkus (18:06)
  • Re: ugly query slower in 7.3, even slower after vacuum full analyze Tom Lane (17:17)
  • ugly query slower in 7.3, even slower after vacuum full analyze SZŰCS Gábor (15:29)
• 21 May 2003
  • Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron? scott.marlowe (16:24)
  • Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron? Ron Johnson (15:02)
  • Re: nested select query failing amol (10:00)
  • Re: 7.3.2 vs 7.1.2 Eugene Fokin (07:25)
  • Re: 7.3.2 vs 7.1.2 Eugene Fokin (07:13)
  • Re: 7.3.2 vs 7.1.2 Eugene Fokin (07:09)
• 20 May 2003
  • Re: 7.3.2 vs 7.1.2 Tom Lane (17:34)
  • Re: 7.3.2 vs 7.1.2 Tom Lane (16:40)
  • Re: 7.3.2 vs 7.1.2 Josh Berkus (16:36)
  • Re: 7.3.2 vs 7.1.2 -- Ooops Josh Berkus (16:32)
  • Re: 7.3.2 vs 7.1.2 Josh Berkus (16:31)
  • Re: 7.3.2 vs 7.1.2 Victor Yegorov (15:55)
  • Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron? scott.marlowe (15:49)
  • Re: 7.3.2 vs 7.1.2 Eugene Fokin (15:34)
  • Re: nested select query failing Tom Lane (15:18)
  • Re: 7.3.2 vs 7.1.2 Victor Yegorov (14:04)
  • Re: 7.3.2 vs 7.1.2 Eugene Fokin (13:28)
  • Re: 7.3.2 vs 7.1.2 Rod Taylor (13:09)
  • Re: 7.3.2 vs 7.1.2 Victor Yegorov (13:06)
  • 7.3.2 vs 7.1.2 Eugene Fokin (12:28)
  • Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron? Andrew Sullivan (11:28)
  • Re: nested select query failing amol (09:57)
  • Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron? Hannu Krosing (09:26)
• 19 May 2003
  • postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron? george young (22:12)
• 15 May 2003
  • Re: [ADMIN] nested query too expensive Stephan Szabo (15:09)
  • Re: nested select query failing Stephan Szabo (14:57)
  • Re: FW: [ADMIN] Out of disk space- error code Andrew Sullivan (12:38)
  • Re: nested select query failing SZUCS Gábor (11:57)
  • FW: [ADMIN] Out of disk space- error code Anagha Joshi (10:39)
  • Re: nested select query failing Christopher Kings-Lynne (04:24)
  • Re: nested select query failing Victor Yegorov (03:49)
  • nested select query failing amol (03:41)
  • Re: PERFORMANCE and SIZE Rudi Starcevic (03:40)
  • Re: PERFORMANCE and SIZE Bruce Momjian (03:30)
  • Re: INNER JOIN vs WHERE Tom Lane (02:25)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Rudi Starcevic (02:24)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Victor Yegorov (02:18)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Rudi Starcevic (02:10)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Rudi Starcevic (02:02)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Victor Yegorov (01:55)
  • INNER JOIN vs WHERE T. Alex Beamish (01:46)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Rudi Starcevic (01:43)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Stephan Szabo (01:24)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Stephan Szabo (01:23)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Rudi Starcevic (01:04)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Victor Yegorov (01:01)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Stephan Szabo (00:49)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Rudi Starcevic (00:47)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Stephan Szabo (00:46)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Victor Yegorov (00:10)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Rudi Starcevic (00:02)
• 14 May 2003
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Rudi Starcevic (23:51)
  • Re: constraint with reference to the same table Stephan Szabo (23:28)
  • constraint with reference to the same table Victor Yegorov (23:09)
• 13 May 2003
  • Re: Finding filenames for tables Jamie Lawrence (23:11)
  • Re: How are null's stored? -- Some numbers Jim C. Nasby (21:55)
  • Re: Finding filenames for tables Andreas Pflug (21:52)
  • Finding filenames for tables Jamie Lawrence (21:31)
  • Re: PERFORMANCE and SIZE scott.marlowe (21:05)
  • Re: How are null's stored? Tom Lane (20:16)
  • Re: How are null's stored? Stephan Szabo (19:45)
  • Re: PERFORMANCE and SIZE Josh Berkus (16:15)
  • Re: [repost] partial index / funxtional idx or bad sql? Tom Lane (14:46)
  • Re: PERFORMANCE and SIZE Alfranio Junior (12:31)
  • Re: [repost] partial index / funxtional idx or bad sql? Jim C. Nasby (10:58)
  • Re: [repost] partial index / funxtional idx or bad sql? csajl (04:03)
  • Re: [repost] partial index / funxtional idx or bad sql? csajl (03:58)
  • Re: [repost] partial index / funxtional idx or bad sql? Stephan Szabo (03:47)
  • Re: [repost] partial index / funxtional idx or bad sql? Josh Berkus (03:32)
  • Re: PERFORMANCE and SIZE Nikolaus Dilger (02:14)
  • Re: [repost] partial index / funxtional idx or bad sql? csajl (00:47)
  • Re: [repost] partial index / funxtional idx or bad sql? Josh Berkus (00:14)
  • [repost] partial index / funxtional idx or bad sql? csajl (00:07)
• 12 May 2003
  • partial index / funxtional idx or bad sql? csajl (23:50)
  • Re: How are null's stored? Tom Lane (23:50)
  • Re: How are null's stored? Stephan Szabo (23:19)
  • Re: How are null's stored? Josh Berkus (22:47)
  • Re: How are null's stored? Andrew Sullivan (21:04)
  • Re: How are null's stored? Ryan (20:53)
  • Re: How are null's stored? Josh Berkus (20:45)
  • How are null's stored? Jim C. Nasby (19:02)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]