Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
275 messages
01 May 2003
Re: [SQL] 7.3 analyze & vacuum analyze problem Tom Lane (00:10)
30 April 2003
Re: [SQL] 7.3 analyze & vacuum analyze problem Josh Berkus (18:48)
Re: Like search performance. Josh Berkus (17:33)
Re: Like search performance. SZUCS Gábor (17:26)
Re: Like search performance. Nikolaus Dilger (17:08)
Like search performance. Diehl, Jeffrey (16:34)
Re: Why LIMIT after scanning the table? Jean-Luc Lachance (16:22)
Re: [SQL] 7.3 analyze & vacuum analyze problem Achilleus Mantzios (16:11)
Re: [SQL] 7.3 analyze & vacuum analyze problem Josh Berkus (16:03)
Re: Query Plan far worse in 7.3.2 than 7.2.1 Peter Darley (15:14)
Re: Query Plan far worse in 7.3.2 than 7.2.1 Tom Lane (14:54)
Query Plan far worse in 7.3.2 than 7.2.1 Peter Darley (14:40)
Re: Why LIMIT after scanning the table? Tom Lane (14:22)
Re: Why LIMIT after scanning the table? Stephan Szabo (14:19)
Re: More tablescanning fun Manfred Koizar (14:17)
Re: Query Plan far worse in 7.3.2 than 7.2.1 SZŰCS Gábor (11:00)
Re: Is 292 inserts/sec acceptable performance ? Rajesh Kumar Mallah (07:38)
Why LIMIT after scanning the table? Jim C. Nasby (06:04)
29 April 2003
Re: Query Plan far worse in 7.3.2 than 7.2.1 SZŰCS Gábor (16:04)
Re: profiling plpgsql functions.. Tom Lane (16:02)
Re: profiling plpgsql functions.. mallah (15:57)
Re: Is 292 inserts/sec acceptable performance ? mallah (15:49)
Re: Best ODBC cursor and lock types for fastest reading? Robert John Shepherd (15:44)
Re: Best ODBC cursor and lock types for fastest reading? Josh Berkus (15:40)
Re: Query Plan far worse in 7.3.2 than 7.2.1 Tom Lane (14:53)
Re: profiling plpgsql functions.. Tom Lane (14:28)
Re: Optimizer not using index when it should Tom Lane (14:18)
Re: Is 292 inserts/sec acceptable performance ? Tom Lane (14:01)
Best ODBC cursor and lock types for fastest reading? Robert John Shepherd (13:53)
Query Plan far worse in 7.3.2 than 7.2.1 SZŰCS Gábor (13:35)
Re: Optimizer not using index when it should Rod Taylor (13:04)
profiling plpgsql functions.. Rajesh Kumar Mallah (11:24)
Re: Is 292 inserts/sec acceptable performance ? Rajesh Kumar Mallah (11:12)
Optimizer not using index when it should Rob Messer (09:03)
Re: Is 292 inserts/sec acceptable performance ? Shridhar Daithankar (07:26)
Is 292 inserts/sec acceptable performance ? Rajesh Kumar Mallah (07:01)
28 April 2003
Re: How to get the optimizer to use an index with multiple scott.marlowe (20:04)
Re: How to get the optimizer to use an index with multiple fields Jim C. Nasby (18:32)
How to get the optimizer to use an index with multiple fields Jim C. Nasby (18:21)
Re: Diferent execution plan for similar query Andrew Sullivan (11:12)
Re: Diferent execution plan for similar query Shridhar Daithankar (11:01)
Re: Diferent execution plan for similar query Magnus Naeslund(w) (11:00)
Re: Diferent execution plan for similar query Magnus Naeslund(w) (10:59)
Re: Diferent execution plan for similar query Shridhar Daithankar (10:41)
Diferent execution plan for similar query jgimenez (10:39)
Re: pgsql BLOB issues Christopher Kings-Lynne (08:20)
Re: pgsql BLOB issues Jeremy Andrus (05:33)
Re: pgsql BLOB issues Tom Lane (05:00)
pgsql BLOB issues Jeremy Andrus (02:30)
27 April 2003
26 April 2003
Re: Automatic analyze on select into Jim C. Nasby (18:16)
Re: Automatic analyze on select into Tom Lane (16:18)
Automatic analyze on select into Jim C. Nasby (15:15)
25 April 2003
Indexes with different datatypes:Correction Cecilia Alvarez (22:36)
Indexes with different datatypes Cecilia Alvarez (22:33)
Re: More tablescanning fun Tom Lane (20:10)
Re: More tablescanning fun Jim C. Nasby (16:56)
Re: More tablescanning fun Hannu Krosing (16:28)
Re: Important speed difference between a query and a function with the same query Jim C. Nasby (15:09)
Re: More tablescanning fun Jim C. Nasby (14:38)
Re: Important speed difference between a query and a Hannu Krosing (07:01)
Re: More tablescanning fun Tom Lane (05:23)
Re: More tablescanning fun Jim C. Nasby (04:59)
24 April 2003
More tablescanning fun Jim C. Nasby (23:38)
Re: Important speed difference between a query and a Frederic Jolliton (17:40)
Re: Important speed difference between a query and a Stephan Szabo (17:28)
Re: Important speed difference between a query and a Frederic Jolliton (16:41)
Re: Important speed difference between a query and a Frederic Jolliton (16:33)
Re: Important speed difference between a query and a Stephan Szabo (15:57)
Re: Important speed difference between a query and a Tom Lane (15:57)
Re: Important speed difference between a query and a Frederic Jolliton (15:47)
23 April 2003
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Greg Stark (16:34)
22 April 2003
Re: the RAID question, again scott.marlowe (17:34)
Re: the RAID question, again Josh Berkus (17:19)
Re: the RAID question, again Vincent van Leeuwen (12:11)
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Christopher Kings-Lynne (08:33)
Re: choosing the right platform Jim C. Nasby (08:30)
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Jim C. Nasby (08:23)
21 April 2003
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Tom Lane (01:53)
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Kevin Brown (00:46)
20 April 2003
problems Ian Knopke (18:09)
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Andrew Sullivan (16:46)
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Andreas Pflug (15:38)
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Tom Lane (15:25)
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Tom Lane (15:21)
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Andreas Pflug (10:07)
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Kevin Brown (06:28)
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Tom Lane (03:34)
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Kevin Brown (01:13)
19 April 2003
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Josh Berkus (19:04)
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Tom Lane (15:58)
Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Kevin Brown (13:01)
18 April 2003
Re: [HACKERS] Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo (06:25)
Re: [HACKERS] Foreign key performance Tom Lane (06:06)
Re: Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo (05:30)
Foreign key performance Kevin Brown (05:11)
Re: Query speed problems Nikolaus Dilger (01:26)
17 April 2003
Re: Query speed problems Victor Danilchenko (20:30)
Re: Query speed problems Victor Danilchenko (20:24)
Re: Query speed problems Peter Darley (19:59)
Re: Query speed problems Stephan Szabo (19:55)
Re: Query speed problems Victor Danilchenko (19:38)
Query speed problems Victor Danilchenko (19:17)
Performance of Inherits versus Views dex (17:48)
Re: dum query plan: more info. Tom Lane (16:31)
Re: dum query plan: more info. Manfred Koizar (16:28)
dum query plan: more info. Jonathan Moore (15:29)
Re: dum query plan Jean-Luc Lachance (14:11)
Re: the RAID question, again Josh Berkus (03:21)
Re: dum query plan Tom Lane (03:15)
Re: the RAID question, again Nikolaus Dilger (02:32)
Re: dum query plan Stephan Szabo (01:21)
dum query plan Jonathan Moore (00:03)
16 April 2003
Re: for help! Andrew Sullivan (16:12)
Re: for help! Tom Lane (16:01)
Re: for help! Andrew Sullivan (15:53)
Re: for help! Josh Berkus (15:48)
Re: Do Views offer any performance advantage? Andreas Pflug (08:45)
Is there a performance between Inherits and Views? dex (06:10)
15 April 2003
Re: Do Views offer any performance advantage? Andreas Pflug (19:55)
Using indexes for like foo% type queries when foo isn't constant (not a locale issue) Greg Stark (19:05)
Re: Do Views offer any performance advantage? Tom Lane (17:26)
Re: for help! scott.marlowe (16:39)
Re: [GENERAL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Richard Huxton (16:29)
Do Views offer any performance advantage? Robert John Shepherd (15:49)
Re: for help! Will LaShell (15:40)
Re: [GENERAL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Bruce Momjian (14:23)
Re: for help! Shridhar Daithankar (09:54)
for help! linweidong (09:47)
14 April 2003
12 April 2003
Re: update query blows out shane hill (18:06)
Re: update query blows out Tom Lane (17:17)
update query blows out shane hill (17:06)
11 April 2003
Re: Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) Josh Berkus (16:16)
Re: Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) scott.marlowe (15:19)
Re: Help analyzing 7.2.4 EXPLAIN Josh Berkus (00:13)
10 April 2003
Re: Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) Jean-Luc Lachance (18:59)
Re: Slow Visual Basic application Patrick Hatcher (18:58)
Re: Reference data for performance testing? Chris Hedemark (17:47)
Slow Visual Basic application Cecilia Alvarez (17:35)
Re: Reference data for performance testing? Boris Popov (17:24)
Re: Reference data for performance testing? Josh Berkus (17:23)
Reference data for performance testing? Boris Popov (17:21)
Re: choosing the right platform Tom Lane (17:17)
Re: choosing the right platform scott.marlowe (16:58)
Re: choosing the right platform scott.marlowe (16:49)
Re: Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) Tom Lane (14:40)
Re: Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) Jean-Luc Lachance (14:26)
Re: Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) Shridhar Daithankar (09:58)
Re: Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) David McKain (09:34)
Re: Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) Ron Johnson (08:18)
Re: Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) Josh Berkus (03:46)
Re: Help analyzing 7.2.4 EXPLAIN Josh Berkus (03:39)
Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) Matthew Nuzum (01:16)
Re: Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) Matthew Nuzum (01:15)
Re: Help analyzing 7.2.4 EXPLAIN Tom Lane (00:51)
Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) Tom Lane (00:21)
Help analyzing 7.2.4 EXPLAIN Josh Berkus (00:15)
09 April 2003
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
pgsql-performance 2003-04 Chronological Index (1/2)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 04:23:14 2012275 messages
- Thread Index
- [Prev Page]
- [Next Page]
- 18 January 2012
- [no subject] Unknown (04:23)
- [no subject] Unknown (04:23)
- Re: [SQL] 7.3 analyze & vacuum analyze problem Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:51)
- Re: [SQL] 7.3 analyze & vacuum analyze problem Ron Mayer (22:25)
- Re: Query Plan far worse in 7.3.2 than 7.2.1 Tom Lane (23:05)
- Re: How to get the optimizer to use an index with multiple Jim C. Nasby (22:54)
- Re: More tablescanning fun Hannu Krosing (06:50)
- Re: Automatic analyze on select into Tom Lane (18:40)
- Re: Indexes with different datatypes:Correction scott.marlowe (22:49)
- Re: More tablescanning fun Tom Lane (23:58)
- Important speed difference between a query and a function with the same query Frederic Jolliton (17:55)
- Re: the RAID question, again Will LaShell (17:45)
- Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Josh Berkus (16:15)
- Re: problems Tom Lane (18:36)
- Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used Tom Lane (20:26)
- Re: Query speed problems Victor Danilchenko (15:01)
- Re: Query speed problems Stephan Szabo (21:08)
- the RAID question, again Vincent van Leeuwen (16:26)
- Re: Do Views offer any performance advantage? Tom Lane (23:37)
- Multicolumn indexes and equal conditions Bruno Wolff III (01:45)
- Re: update query blows out Tom Lane (20:53)
- Re: Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) Ron Mayer (17:38)
- Re: Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) Ron Mayer (23:15)
- Re: choosing the right platform Jim C. Nasby (23:58)
- Thread Index
- [Prev Page]
- [Next Page]