• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-sql
    • pgsql-students
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-performance 2002-11 Chronological Index (1/2)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• 18 January 2012
  • [no subject] Unknown (04:23)
• 30 November 2002
  • Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2 Justin Clift (19:47)
  • Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2 Laurette Cisneros (16:40)
• 29 November 2002
  • Re: Query performance discontinuity Manfred Koizar (18:24)
• 28 November 2002
  • Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2 eric soroos (18:39)
  • Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2 eric soroos (18:32)
  • Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2 eric soroos (18:14)
  • Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2 Justin Clift (12:57)
  • Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2 Ron Johnson (12:05)
  • Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2 Richard Huxton (09:45)
• 27 November 2002
  • Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2 eric soroos (20:45)
  • Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2 Tom Lane (19:19)
  • Low Budget Performance, Part 2 eric soroos (18:51)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Realtime VACUUM, was: performance of scott.marlowe (17:20)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Realtime VACUUM, was: performance of insert/delete/update Dave Page (15:23)
  • Child process procedures Thrasher (15:11)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Realtime VACUUM, was: performance of insert/delete/update Jim Beckstrom (15:07)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Realtime VACUUM, was: performance of insert/delete/update Nicolai Tufar (14:25)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Realtime VACUUM, was: performance of insert/delete/update Tom Lane (03:13)
  • Re: Full Text Index disk space requirements typea (02:40)
• 26 November 2002
  • Re: Full Text Index disk space requirements Hannu Krosing (21:33)
  • Re: Full Text Index disk space requirements typea (20:18)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Robert Treat (19:40)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Realtime VACUUM, was: performance of insert/delete/update Bruce Momjian (19:16)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update scott.marlowe (18:47)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Andrew Sullivan (18:24)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update scott.marlowe (18:08)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Andrew Sullivan (16:54)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Andrew Sullivan (16:50)
  • [HACKERS] Realtime VACUUM, was: performance of insert/delete/update Curtis Faith (15:32)
  • Re: Full Text Index disk space requirements Maarten Boekhold (12:49)
  • Full Text Index disk space requirements typea (09:36)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Ron Johnson (04:27)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Rod Taylor (03:52)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Tom Lane (03:45)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Tom Lane (03:30)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Ron Johnson (01:52)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Ron Johnson (01:41)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Josh Berkus (01:39)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Rich Scott (00:43)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update scott.marlowe (00:43)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Tim Gardner (00:41)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update scott.marlowe (00:33)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update scott.marlowe (00:25)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Rod Taylor (00:19)
• 25 November 2002
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Tim Gardner (23:44)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update scott.marlowe (23:01)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Josh Berkus (22:30)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update scott.marlowe (16:34)
• 23 November 2002
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Tom Lane (21:41)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Josh Berkus (21:27)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Tom Lane (21:20)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Josh Berkus (20:46)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Tom Lane (20:41)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Josh Berkus (20:29)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Tom Lane (20:20)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Josh Berkus (19:23)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Ron Johnson (15:05)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Josh Berkus (04:13)
• 22 November 2002
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update scott.marlowe (15:56)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on Andrew Sullivan (15:01)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on philip johnson (14:16)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on Tom Lane (13:52)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on Mario Weilguni (07:31)
• 21 November 2002
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Josh Berkus (23:32)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update scott.marlowe (22:55)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on scott.marlowe (22:38)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Josh Berkus (22:22)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on Bjoern Metzdorf (21:58)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update scott.marlowe (21:50)
  • Re: stange optimizer results Stephan Szabo (21:26)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on scott.marlowe (21:25)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Wei Weng (21:24)
  • Re: performance of insert/delete/update Josh Berkus (21:19)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no Josh Berkus (21:17)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no Josh Berkus (21:16)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on Bjoern Metzdorf (20:53)
  • [no subject] Francisco J Reyes (20:42)
  • Re: stange optimizer results Peter T. Brown (20:36)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on scott.marlowe (20:17)
  • performance of insert/delete/update Wei Weng (20:14)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on Mike Nielsen (20:03)
  • Re: Query Analysis Tom Lane (19:41)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on scott.marlowe (19:39)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster HDDs eric soroos (19:31)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster HDDs Bjoern Metzdorf (19:24)
  • Re: vacuum full Tom Lane (19:22)
  • Re: Query Analysis typea (19:21)
  • Re: vacuum full scott.marlowe (19:13)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster HDDs Rajesh Kumar Mallah. (19:04)
  • Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster HDDs Steve Crawford (18:56)
  • Re: vacuum full george young (18:50)
  • Re: stange optimizer results Stephan Szabo (18:35)
  • Re: stange optimizer results Stephan Szabo (18:34)
  • Re: vacuum full Henrik Steffen (18:20)
  • Re: vacuum full Henrik Steffen (18:18)
  • Re: H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster HDDs Rajesh Kumar Mallah. (17:54)
  • Re: H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster HDDs Rajesh Kumar Mallah. (17:42)
  • Re: Is there a system of cache in pgsql 7.3rc1 ? scott.marlowe (17:42)
  • Re: vacuum full scott.marlowe (17:34)
  • Re: H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster scott.marlowe (17:32)
  • stange optimizer results Peter T. Brown (17:21)
  • Re: H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster Charles H. Woloszynski (17:05)
  • vacuum full Henrik Steffen (16:52)
  • H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster HDDs Rajesh Kumar Mallah. (16:40)
  • Re: Query Analysis typea (16:16)
  • Is there a system of cache in pgsql 7.3rc1 ? David Pradier (09:29)
• 20 November 2002
  • Re: Query Analysis Josh Berkus (23:50)
  • Query Analysis typea (23:40)
  • Re: selects from large tables Hannu Krosing (20:26)
  • [no subject] Francisco Reyes (18:53)
  • Re: selects from large tables Rod Taylor (15:56)
  • Re: selects from large tables Nikk Anderson (15:49)
  • Re: selects from large tables Rod Taylor (15:30)
  • Re: selects from large tables Tom Lane (15:19)
  • Re: selects from large tables Bruce Momjian (15:18)
  • Re: selects from large tables Nikk Anderson (15:08)
• 19 November 2002
  • Re: Slow DELETE with IN clausule Richard Huxton (14:45)
  • Re: Slow DELETE with IN clausule Andrew Sullivan (14:39)
  • Slow DELETE with IN clausule Jirka Novak (14:26)
  • Re: for/loop performance in plpgsql ? Tom Lane (14:08)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Question regarding effects of Vacuum, Vacuum Rod Taylor (13:46)
  • Re: for/loop performance in plpgsql ? Federico /* juri */ Pedemonte (09:53)
  • Re: for/loop performance in plpgsql ? Tom Lane (05:23)
• 18 November 2002
  • Re: selects from large tables Robert Treat (18:48)
  • Re: selects from large tables Nikk Anderson (16:36)
  • Re: selects from large tables Nikk Anderson (16:32)
  • Re: selects from large tables Stephan Szabo (16:32)
  • Re: selects from large tables Tom Lane (16:27)
  • Re: selects from large tables Charles H. Woloszynski (15:58)
  • Re: selects from large tables Andrew Sullivan (15:43)
  • Re: selects from large tables Nikk Anderson (15:36)
  • Re: selects from large tables Nikk Anderson (15:31)
  • Re: selects from large tables Tom Lane (15:08)
  • Re: for/loop performance in plpgsql ? Federico (15:04)
  • Re: selects from large tables Stephan Szabo (13:02)
  • selects from large tables Nikk Anderson (12:33)
  • Re: Sort time Stephan Szabo (11:56)
  • Re: Sort time pginfo (11:12)
  • Re: Sort time pginfo (07:06)
• 17 November 2002
  • Re: Sort time Tom Lane (23:54)
  • Re: Sort time Tom Lane (23:05)
  • Re: Sort time Hannu Krosing (21:10)
  • Re: Sort time Tom Lane (20:56)
  • Re: Sort time Stephan Szabo (17:29)
  • Re: Sort time pginfo (09:11)
  • Re: Sort time pginfo (08:25)
  • Re: Sort time Stephan Szabo (08:18)
  • Re: Sort time Stephan Szabo (07:44)
  • Re: Sort time pginfo (07:27)
• 16 November 2002
  • Re: Sort time Stephan Szabo (17:15)
  • Re: Sort time pginfo (07:32)
  • Re: Sort time pginfo (07:16)
• 15 November 2002
  • Re: Sort time Tom Lane (23:32)
  • ANALYZE and indexes (was Re: Sort time) Tom Lane (23:02)
  • Re: Sort time Rod Taylor (22:39)
  • Re: Sort time Josh Berkus (21:16)
  • Re: Sort time Rod Taylor (20:54)
  • Re: can this query be made to run faster? Rod Taylor (20:08)
  • can this query be made to run faster? Peter T. Brown (19:53)
  • Re: Sort time Josh Berkus (19:25)
  • Re: Sort time Rod Taylor (19:24)
  • Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine? Josh Berkus (18:53)
  • Re: Sort time Josh Berkus (17:56)
  • Re: Sort time Josh Berkus (17:52)
  • Re: Sort time pginfo (17:44)
  • Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine? Josh Berkus (17:30)
  • Re: Sort time pginfo (16:33)
  • Re: Sort time Tom Lane (16:29)
  • Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine? Stephan Szabo (16:25)
  • Re: Sort time pginfo (16:08)
  • Re: Sort time Tom Lane (15:39)
  • Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine? Andrew Sullivan (14:34)
  • Re: for/loop performance in plpgsql ? Richard Huxton (13:45)
  • Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine? Cedric Dufour (Cogito Ergo Soft) (13:37)
  • Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine? Andrew Sullivan (12:59)
  • for/loop performance in plpgsql ? Federico (12:38)
  • Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine? Henrik Steffen (10:11)
  • Re: swapping? Adam Witney (09:42)
  • Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine? Cedric Dufour (Cogito Ergo Soft) (08:47)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]