Re: Patch to add a feature to pg_standby
- From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
- To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
- Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, chris(dot)johnson(at)desknetinc(dot)com, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Patch to add a feature to pg_standby
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:31:33 -0700
- Message-id: <20080430143133.GA21665@fetter.org> <text/plain>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:49:44PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 11:29 +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > This could be implemented by a "pass-through" restore_command,
> > that calls pg_standby, and does the custom action when pg_standby
> > returns successfully.
>
> Yes, that's the preferred route for most cases.
>
> pg_standby was designed to be customisable, so if it works for
> Chris, thats OK.
>
> After some mulling on this, I'm not sure we need to include this in
> pg_standby however. If we did we'd end up having before/after
> commands and retry options etc.
Would those be good things to have as a whole package?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index