Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width
- From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
- To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Bryce Nesbitt" <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:17:42 -0400
- Message-id: <87ve20f8eh.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> <text/plain>
"Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > > I have updated the documentation for this patch. I consider it ready to
>> > > apply. I think it is as close to a middle ground as we are going to
>> > > get. Further adjustment will have to happen when we have more reports
>> > > from the field.
>> >
>> > I heard a pretty compelling argument to make "wrapped" part of "aligned",
>> > and thus I think the patch is ready to go only after adjusting the
>> > user-facing syntax:
>
> I think this is what makes the most sense of what I've seen so far.
> Wrapped is a special case of aligned anyway (there's no "wrapped
> unaligned" or "wrapped HTML" for example, nor would we want there to
> be.)
Well there's no unaligned HTML or aligned unaligned either...
> I think that could be fixed easily by having the syntax be something
> like
>
> \pset format aligned:80
> \pset format aligned:autowrap
I suppose. It seems kind of inconvenient though, what advantage does it have?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index