Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard
- From: Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM>
- To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:27:58 -0600
- Message-id: <47C878DE.2090608@sun.com> <text/plain>
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Would it work to name the traces "trace_transaction__start" etc instead?
AFAICS that would cause the macros to be named
POSTGRESQL_TRACE_TRANSACTION_START()
Correct, and that would work. With this approach, all the probe names
will start with trace-, and this particular one will be called
trace-transaction-start and can be used this way.
postgresql*:::trace-transaction-start
{
...
}
Actually, it reads better to me than having trace in front. If the above
macro name is acceptable, I'll take this route.
Regards,
-Robert
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index