Re: [HACKERS] status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...

[Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>]

We seem to be stuck on this patch.  Hannu wrote it, Tom doesn't trust
it, and no one else is commenting.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hannu Krosing wrote:
> ?hel kenal p?eval, K, 2005-12-21 kell 09:50, kirjutas Hannu Krosing:
> > ?hel kenal p?eval, T, 2005-12-20 kell 17:18, kirjutas Tom Lane:
> > > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> > > > i was just wondering about the status of hannu's concurrent vacuum patch.
> > > > are there any plans to integrate this
> > > 
> > > I still don't trust it (assuming that you're thinking of the same patch
> > > I am).
> > 
> > What could I do to increase your trust in it ?
> > 
> > Could you think of any specific case it could break ? Or any specific
> > tests to check for it ?
> > 
> > I attach the version of the patch for 8.1.0 for anyone interested in
> > checking it.
> 
> It was pointed out to me that I did'nt.
> 
> So here it is:
> 
> ---------------
> Hannu
> 

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
>                http://archives.postgresql.org

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073