Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: default resource limits
- From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
- To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
- Subject: Re: default resource limits
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:22:31 +0100
- Message-id: <200512241222.31677.peter_e@gmx.net> <text/plain>
Am Samstag, 24. Dezember 2005 00:20 schrieb Andrew Dunstan: > The rationale is one connection per apache thread (which on Windows > defaults to 400). If people think this is too many I could live with > winding it back a bit - the defaults number of apache workers on Unix is > 250, IIRC. It's 150. I don't mind increasing the current 100 to 150, although I find tying this to apache pretty bogus. I really don't like the prospect of making the defaults platform specific, especially if the only rationale for that would be "apache does it". Why does apache allocate more connections on Windows anyway?
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: default resource limits
- From: Robert Treat
- Re: default resource limits
- References:
- Re: default resource limits
- From: daveg
- Re: default resource limits
- From: Andrew Dunstan
- Re: default resource limits
- Prev by Date: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2120: Crash when doing UTF8<->ISO_8859_8
- Next by Date: Re: default resource limits
- Previous by thread: Re: default resource limits
- Next by thread: Re: default resource limits
- Indexes: