Re: fork/exec patch: pre-CreateProcess finalization

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fork/exec patch: pre-CreateProcess finalization
Date: 2003-12-28 10:34:49
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B0280AE@harris.memetrics.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


[minor corrections (some duplication in arg passing); still under
discussion/review]

Cheers,
Claudio

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Claudio Natoli [mailto:claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com]
> Sent: Saturday, 27 December 2003 9:27 PM
> To: 'Tom Lane'
> Cc: 'pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org'
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] fork/exec patch: pre-CreateProcess
> finalization
>
>
>
> [patch edited + resubmitted for review; not for committing]
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> figuring that, on balance, you are in fact going to prefer to take a
> potential future hit in duplicated work (in passing context
> in the fork/exec
> case) over moving the client auth code to PostgresMain, I've
> just gone ahead
> and made a patch that implements your BackendFork ideas...
>
> Please let me know:
>
> * if the changes to the BackendFork / SubPostmasterMain logic
> are more or
> less what you envisaged, and if you are content with them
> [Note: we can also
> roll BackendInit back into BackendFork, making BackendFork
> (now BackendRun?)
> pretty much exactly as it was before the fork/exec changes began]
>
> * if you are content with the above, whether or not you think
> I ought to do
> the same for the SSDataBase logic. I'm hoping for a negative,
> as the #ifdef
> logic is not as convoluted as that originally presented in
> BackendFork (ie.
> to me, it looks like overkill in this case), but anticipating
> otherwise :-)
>
> Also:
> * are you ok with the pgstat changes (I'm guessing yes, as you haven't
> mentioned them, and since these changes are pretty similar to what you
> suggested for BackendFork)
>
> Cheers,
> Claudio
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from
> Memetrics.
> For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
> <a
> href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.me
> metrics.com/em
> ailpolicy.html</a>
>
>
>

---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>

Attachment Content-Type Size
diff5c3.out application/octet-stream 29.5 KB

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2003-12-28 11:31:42 libpq endless loop if client_min_messages=debug1
Previous Message Claudio Natoli 2003-12-27 23:48:00 Re: fork/exec patch: pre-CreateProcess finalization