Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search archives
  Advanced Search

Re: WIP: unique hash indexes


  • From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
  • To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
  • Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
  • Subject: Re: WIP: unique hash indexes
  • Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 00:04:10 -0500 (EST)
  • Message-id: <200312010504.hB154A219031@candle.pha.pa.us> <text/plain>

Patch removed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Neil Conway wrote:
> Attached is a patch that implements unique hash indexes. Regression
> tests and docs have been updated (with the exception of
> src/backend/access/hash/README).
> 
> This patches implements an improved version of the concurrency changes I
> outlined on -hackers a couple days ago: the separate lock for
> "right-of-insertion" into a bucket chain has been replaced by making use
> of existing lmgr lockmodes to get the behavior we need.
> 
> I also took the opportunity to refactor the hash index code in a couple
> places by moving duplicated code into separate functions, fixed some
> typos in the README file, etc.
> 
> I've tested this a little bit (it survives 100,000 single-user pgbench
> transactions, and 10 concurrent clients doing 1000 transactions each),
> but I need to do more testing in the future.
> 
> As far as I know, the unique hash index code is functionally complete,
> but don't add this to the patch queue (it is obviously for 7.5, anyway),
> since I'm about to get started on some related hash index work, for
> which I'll submit a mega-patch containing everything. I just posted this
> here so that anyone who's interested can take a look at it -- comments
> are welcome.
> 
> Thanks to Tom Lane, who was very helpful when I asked him code
> questions, including suggesting the improved concurrency design I
> mentioned above.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Neil
> 

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>       joining column's datatypes do not match

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996 – 2012 PostgreSQL Global Development Group