Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
- From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
- Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:26:30 -0700
- Message-id: <3F342396.70701@joeconway.com> <text/plain>
Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:OK. If the attached patch is acceptable/applied, I'll fix and resend the doc patch.I'm unconvinced that the parse-time-constant implementation Lockhart started has anything whatever to do with the semantics the SQL99 spec has in mind.
Yeah - I've realized this is quite a bit harder than it seemed on the surface. However it is still useful, as is, when working with polymorphic functions.
So do we rip it out, leave it undocumented, or document it including the deviation from spec?
Joe
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
- References:
- Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
- From: Joe Conway
- Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
- From: Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
- From: Joe Conway
- Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
- Prev by Date: Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
- Next by Date: Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
- Previous by thread: Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
- Next by thread: Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
- Indexes: