Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: PGDG ODBC, ODBCng, DBD::Pg
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
- Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: PGDG ODBC, ODBCng, DBD::Pg
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:21:17 -0700
>>
>> The versions tested were:
>>
>> PGDG: 08.01.0200-2
>> ODBCng: Rev 76
>> DBD::Pg: 1.49
>
> Any chance of running the same test again against psqlODBC 08.02.0100?
> It's a totally different architecture to the 08.01 series.
Be happy to.
>
> You might also try something like odbc-bench for some more realistic
> tests.
You bet.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers, Dave.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
- References:
- Re: PGDG ODBC, ODBCng, DBD::Pg
- From: Dave Page
- Re: PGDG ODBC, ODBCng, DBD::Pg
- Prev by Date: Re: New release of psqODBC?
- Next by Date: Re: PGDG ODBC, ODBCng, DBD::Pg
- Previous by thread: Re: PGDG ODBC, ODBCng, DBD::Pg
- Next by thread: Re: PGDG ODBC, ODBCng, DBD::Pg
- Indexes: