Re: Learning SQL: nested CTE and UNION

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adam Mackler <adammackler(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Learning SQL: nested CTE and UNION
Date: 2012-07-31 17:43:31
Message-ID: 13313.1343756611@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice

Adam Mackler <adammackler(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ... But this does not work:

> WITH outmost AS (
> SELECT 1
> UNION (WITH innermost as (SELECT 2)
> SELECT * FROM innermost
> UNION SELECT 3)
> )
> SELECT * FROM outmost;

> Result:
> ERROR: relation "innermost" does not exist
> LINE 4: SELECT * FROM innermost

This is a bug :-(. The parse analysis code seems to think that WITH can
only be attached to the top level or a leaf-level SELECT within a set
operation tree; but the grammar follows the SQL standard which says
no such thing. The WITH gets accepted, and attached to the
intermediate-level UNION which is where syntactically it should go,
and then it's entirely ignored during parse analysis. Will see about
fixing it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Palle Girgensohn 2012-07-31 19:02:14 build postgresql on Mac OS X mountain lion with ossp-uuid
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2012-07-31 16:50:00 Re: several problems in pg_receivexlog

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message George McIlwaine 2012-07-31 21:16:59 postgres domain service account won't start the postgres service
Previous Message Adam Mackler 2012-07-31 14:47:20 Re: Learning SQL: nested CTE and UNION