Re: check (constraint) on point data type?
- From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
- To: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
- Cc: "Jill" <jill289(at)hotmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: check (constraint) on point data type?
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:19:15 -0500
- Message-id: <F19890E1-0639-48AD-A3B6-366BCF79DA69@seespotcode.net> <text/plain>
[Please don't top post as it makes the discussion more difficult to
follow.]
On Jul 24, 2007, at 16:10 , Jim Nasby wrote:
What's wrong with (NOT location <@ box '((0,0),(1,1))') ?
Two reasons I didn't provide that answer:
1)
On Jul 24, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
I haven't looked at the geometric functions closely enough to see
if you could use some of those rather than defining your own
helper, but this should work.
2) I misread the specs and assumed that 0 and 1 values for x and y
were to be rejected. I suspected that the geometric functions were
inclusive rather than exclusive, which, upon experimentation, was
correct. Right answer to the wrong specs :)
# select not '(0,0)'::point <@ '((0,0),(1,1))'::box;
?column?
----------
f
(1 row)
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index