Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users
- From: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>
- To: "operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com" <operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com>
- Cc: "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:25:22 +1200
On 5/25/06, operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com
imho, both are acceptably fast for the vast majority of applications (which is why i went with features - not the least of which was the license) and if it gets so big it grinds to a halt, you are likely in the commercial db space, anyway.
/me has seen highly expensive, poorly designed Oracle implementations on amazing hardware grind to a halt ... :}
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users
- From: operationsengineer1
- Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users
- References:
- PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users
- From: operationsengineer1
- PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users
- Prev by Date: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users
- Next by Date: Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users
- Previous by thread: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users
- Next by thread: Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users
- Indexes: