Re: getUdateCount() vs. RETURNING clause
- From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
- To: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
- Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: getUdateCount() vs. RETURNING clause
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:40:30 +1300
- Message-id: <4B0C7CFE.50106@opencloud.com> <text/plain>
Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> boolean hasResult = pstmt.execute();
>
> if (hasResult) {
> ResultSet rs = pstmt.getResultSet();
> if (rs != null && rs.next()) {
> int newId = rs.getInt(1);
> System.out.println("newid: " + newId);
> }
> }
>
> int affected = pstmt.getUpdateCount();
> System.out.println("affected: " + affected);
>
> I do see the returned ID from the ResultSet but getUpdateCount() always
> returns -1 even though I know that a row was updated.
> What am I missing here?
Update counts and result sets (for a particular result) are mutually
exclusive. If getResultSet() returns non-null then getUpdateCount() must
return -1; see the javadoc for those two methods.
You probably want to call getMoreResults() in there somewhere to step to
the next result.
-O
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index