Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: "Jignesh K. Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
- Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Thomas Burdairon <tburdairon(at)entelience(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 23:19:45 -0400
- Message-id: <14634.1212031185@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
"Jignesh K. Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> Are there any head fixes proposed for it?
It's been fixed in CVS for a month. We just haven't pushed a release yet.
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index