Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
- From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
- Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:12:06 -0400
- Message-id: <47F199F6.8000504@dunslane.net> <text/plain>
Tom Lane wrote:
The main reason I wanted to make some noise about this is to find out if anyone is actually trying to call eval_const_expressions (or relation_excluded_by_constraints, which it turned out needed to change also) from 8.3 add-on code. If anyone squawks we could think about a faster update ...
That assumes that someone working on using the planner hooks will read this thread - which might be reasonable - I guess they number of likely users is fairly small. But if they might miss it then it would be best to fix it ASAP, ISTM.
cheers andrew
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
- Previous by thread: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
- Indexes: