Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Status of binary protocol usage?
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: aaime74 <andrea(dot)aime(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Status of binary protocol usage?
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 11:40:52 -0400
- Message-id: <18839.1182699652@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
aaime74 <andrea(dot)aime(at)gmail(dot)com> writes: > A profiler informs me that quite a big of time is spent in the > PGBytea.toBytes(byte[]s) method, which is used only if the transfer > occurrs in text mode. That hardly seems like a killer argument for switching to binary (which has got a boatload of disadvantages of its own). Surely a bit of code-optimization work can fix that. regards, tom lane
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Status of binary protocol usage?
- From: aaime74
- Re: Status of binary protocol usage?
- References:
- Status of binary protocol usage?
- From: aaime74
- Status of binary protocol usage?
- Prev by Date: Status of binary protocol usage?
- Next by Date: Re: Status of binary protocol usage?
- Previous by thread: Status of binary protocol usage?
- Next by thread: Re: Status of binary protocol usage?
- Indexes: