Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Binary tx format for an array?
- From: Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>
- To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
- Cc: Michael Guyver <kenevel(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Binary tx format for an array?
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:00:01 +0200
Hi, Dave, Dave Cramer wrote: > I'm curious. Are you attempting to implement the binary protocol for the > jdbc driver ? > > If so, how are you dealing with date types which are either 64 bit or > floating point. > > Have you done any testing to see if it is actually faster ? > > There's certainly no question with timestamp/date parsing, others may be > questionable . At least for PostGIS (which uses a hexed representation for text protocol currently), I expect the data volume to be exactly 50% for binary. Bytea and blobs may be similar. Markus -- Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
- References:
- Binary tx format for an array?
- From: Michael Guyver
- Re: Binary tx format for an array?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Binary tx format for an array?
- From: Michael Guyver
- Re: Binary tx format for an array?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Binary tx format for an array?
- From: Mark Lewis
- Re: Binary tx format for an array?
- From: Michael Guyver
- Re: Binary tx format for an array?
- From: Dave Cramer
- Binary tx format for an array?
- Prev by Date: Re: Binary tx format for an array?
- Next by Date: Re: Binary tx format for an array?
- Previous by thread: Re: Binary tx format for an array?
- Next by thread: Re: Binary tx format for an array?
- Indexes: