Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: JDBC executeUpdate returns 0 for table partitioning rule
- From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
- To: Tea Yu <teayu1(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: JDBC executeUpdate returns 0 for table partitioning rule
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:47:46 -0500 (EST)
- Message-id: <Pine.BSO.4.61.0512061045400.5324@leary.csoft.net> <text/plain>
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Tea Yu wrote:
The scenario is quite simple - insert into a partitioned table in which a rule forwards the insertion into an inherited partition (Postgresql 8.1) However, JDBC returns 0 during Statement.executeUpdate(sql). It behaves normally when partition rule is removed.
That's certainly not what I'm seeing here. I've attached my testcase. So I've shown you mine, now you show me yours.
Kris Jurka
Attachment:
Rule.java
Description: Text document
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Problem with 8.1 driver
- Next by Date: Re: Advise on mapping JTable to large PostgreSQL table
- Previous by thread: Re: JDBC executeUpdate returns 0 for table partitioning rule insertion
- Next by thread: Re: JDBC executeUpdate returns 0 for table partitioning rule insertion
- Indexes: