Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: JDBC executeUpdate returns 0 for table partitioning rule insertion
- From: "Tea Yu" <teayu1(at)gmail(dot)com>
- To: <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: JDBC executeUpdate returns 0 for table partitioning rule insertion
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 18:45:21 +0800
- Message-id: <008701c5fa52$29d69c40$ca78a8c0@yawin.yesasia.com> <text/plain>
Hi there, The scenario is quite simple - insert into a partitioned table in which a rule forwards the insertion into an inherited partition (Postgresql 8.1) However, JDBC returns 0 during Statement.executeUpdate(sql). It behaves normally when partition rule is removed. It applies to the following driver builds: 8.1 Build 404 (all JDBC ver) 8.2 dev Bulid 500 (all JDBC ver) Any clues? Thanks much! Tea
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JDBC executeUpdate returns 0 for table partitioning rule
- From: Kris Jurka
- Re: JDBC executeUpdate returns 0 for table partitioning rule insertion
- From: Dave Cramer
- Re: JDBC executeUpdate returns 0 for table partitioning rule
- Prev by Date: Re: Problem with 8.1 driver
- Next by Date: More about deadlock
- Previous by thread: Advise on mapping JTable to large PostgreSQL table requested?
- Next by thread: Re: JDBC executeUpdate returns 0 for table partitioning rule insertion
- Indexes: