Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [HACKERS] Binary Cursors, and the COPY command
- From: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
- To: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com
- Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Binary Cursors, and the COPY command
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:28:55 +0200
- Message-id: <thhal-0Q9bhAYd/UNsDDyjznLWQVb9lU3V0FY@mailblocks.com> <text/plain>
Oliver Jowett wrote:
What features of 1.4 were you thinking of exploiting?
Well, the java.nio obviously :-)java.nio provides a java.nio.CharBuffer. A java.lang.StringBuffer is synchronized. The CharBuffer is not. Since the JDBC driver uses strings in a lot of places some code could be rewritten to increase performance.
And I think that Mark (pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com) has a point. 90% of all installations would get a performance boost if native byte order was used. IMHO, it's all about an initial protocoll negotiation (which of course must be done in network byte order).
Regards, Thomas Hallgren
- References:
- Re: [HACKERS] Binary Cursors, and the COPY command
- From: Oliver Jowett
- Re: [HACKERS] Binary Cursors, and the COPY command
- Prev by Date: Re: [HACKERS] Binary Cursors, and the COPY command
- Next by Date: Re: [HACKERS] Binary Cursors, and the COPY command
- Previous by thread: Re: [HACKERS] Binary Cursors, and the COPY command
- Next by thread: Re: [HACKERS] Binary Cursors, and the COPY command
- Indexes: