Re: Trouble returning a text field from an SRF

[Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>]

"Rob Tester" <robtester(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I created my tuple that way and set the Datum using
> DirectFunctionCall1(...), but there still seems to be a limitation at 65535
> chars for the data. When my string is 65535 (or shorter) I get the text
> back. When it is longer I get nothing for the string, but the rest of the
> tuple is intact.

Maybe the problem is on the client side?  There's no visible restriction
in the code you quoted (though I am wondering a bit about what "wktStr"
is, and whether you've computed the required size of textOut correctly).

			regards, tom lane