Re: Different gettext domain needed for error context

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Different gettext domain needed for error context
Date: 2012-04-16 08:13:37
Message-ID: 4F8BD4B1.5050901@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15.04.2012 00:54, Tom Lane wrote:
> I really think we need to change errcontext itself to pass the correct
> domain. If we are going to require a domain to be provided (and this
> does require that, for correct operation), then we need to break any
> code that doesn't provide it in a visible fashion.
>
> A possibly more attractive alternative is to redefine errcontext
> with a macro that allows TEXTDOMAIN to be passed in behind-the-scenes,
> thus keeping source-level compatibility. We can do this with the same
> type of hack we've used for many years for elog():
>
> #define errcontext set_errcontext_domain(TEXTDOMAIN), errcontext_msg
>
> where the actual message-passing function is now called errcontext_msg.

Ok then, here's a patch using that approach.

I had to rename a few local variables called "errcontext", because the
macro now tries to expands those and you get an error.

Note: If you want to test this at home, the original test case I posted
doesn't currently work because the text of the context messages in
PL/pgSQL have been slightly changed since I posted the original test
case, but the translations have not been updated yet. Until then, you
can manually remove the double quotes in messages like 'function \"%s\"'
in the .po file to test this.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
errcontext-domain-2.patch text/x-diff 13.7 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-04-16 08:26:24 Re: index-only scans vs. Hot Standby, round two
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-04-16 07:54:31 Re: Last gasp