From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Dickson S(dot) Guedes" <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer |
Date: | 2011-10-25 05:23:34 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nM+J7qEFkUuxtVEPHD2mPB5r5DvSj-chi1wthXc8vQP=rg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> The patch looks sane, it's mostly just moving existing code around, but
> there's one thing that's been bothering me about this whole idea from the
> get-go:
>
> If the bgwriter and checkpointer are two different processes, whenever
> bgwriter writes out a page it needs to send an fsync-request to the
> checkpointer. We avoided that when both functions were performed by the same
> process, but now we have to send and absorb a fsync-request message for
> every single write() that happens in the system, except for those done at
> checkpoints. Isn't that very expensive? Does it make the fsync-request queue
> a bottleneck on some workloads?
That is a reasonable question and one I considered.
I did some benchmarking earlier to see the overhead of that.
Basically, its very small, much, much smaller than I thought.
The benefit of allowing the bgwriter to continue working during long
fsyncs easily outweighs the loss of doing more fsync-requests. Both of
those overheads/problems occur at the same time so there is the
overhead is always covered.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-10-25 05:37:48 | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-10-25 05:12:20 | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |