Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
- From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:53:38 -0400
- Message-id: <1307400758-sup-1570@alvh.no-ip.org> <text/plain>
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie jun 03 09:17:08 -0400 2011: > I've now spent enough time working on this issue now to be convinced > that the approach has merit, if we can work out the kinks. I'll start > with some performance numbers. I hereby recommend that people with patches such as this one while on the last weeks till release should refrain from posting them until the release has actually taken place. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
- From: Robert Haas
- Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
- References:
- reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
- From: Robert Haas
- reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
- Prev by Date: Re: heap vacuum & cleanup locks
- Next by Date: Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support
- Previous by thread: Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
- Next by thread: Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
- Indexes: