Re: pg_dump --split patch

From: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)gluefinance(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump --split patch
Date: 2010-12-30 20:28:18
Message-ID: AANLkTinnnLZaun==PYSiXYZQwh5+YNmMV+=PoZ9VD6G_@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)gluefinance(dot)com> wrote:

> 2010/12/29 Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
>
> Please have a look at getddl:
>>
>> https://github.com/dimitri/getddl
>>
>>
> Nice! Looks like a nifty tool.
> When I tried it, "./getddl.py -f -F /crypt/funcs -d glue", I got the error
> "No such file or directory: 'sql/schemas.sql'".
>
> While the task of splitting objects into separate files could be solved by
> an external "wrapper tool" like yours around pg_dump,
> I argue it makes more sense of putting the (minimal required) logics into
> pg_dump, due to a number of reasons, most importantly because it's simplier
> and less complex, thus less error prone.
>
> My patch is only a few lines of code and doesn't add any logics to pg_dump,
> it merely reroutes the fwrite() system calls based on the toc entries.
>
> Just the fact you and others had to create own tools to do the splitting
> shows the feature is important, which I think should be included in the
> normal pg_dump tool.
>

As someone whose own version of "getddl" helped inspire Dimitri to create
his own version, I've both enjoyed reading this thread and seeing this wheel
reinvented yet again, and wholeheartedly +1 the idea of building this
directly into pg_dump. (The only thing better would be to make everything
thing sql callable, but that's a problem for another day).

Robert Treat
http://www.xzilla.net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-12-30 20:36:30 Re: Sync Rep Design
Previous Message Aidan Van Dyk 2010-12-30 20:24:09 Re: Sync Rep Design