| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_primary_conninfo |
| Date: | 2010-12-29 08:51:42 |
| Message-ID: | 4D1AF69E.9020404@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 29.12.2010 10:36, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 18:12, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Although maybe now that we've made recovery.conf use the GUC lexer we oughta continue in that vein and expose those parameters as PGC_INTERNAL GUCs rather than inventing a new function for it...
>
> That's definitely another option that I wouldn't object to if people
> prefer that way.
I recall from previous discussions that we have a consensus that we
should unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf, so that they're all GUCs
and you can put all the settings in postgresql.conf. Let's do that.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-10/msg00033.php
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-12-29 09:09:56 | Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-12-29 08:36:03 | Re: pg_primary_conninfo |