Concurrent MERGE

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Concurrent MERGE
Date: 2010-08-05 15:43:34
Message-ID: 1281023014.1838.922.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Looks like MERGE is progressing well.

At 2010 Dev Mtg, we put me down to work on making merge work
concurrently. That was garbled slightly and had me down as working on
predicate locking which is the general solution to the problem.

Do we still need me to work on concurrent MERGE, or is that included in
the current MERGE patch (can't see it), or is that covered elsewhere
(for example Kevin Grittner's recent work)?

Still happy to do work as proposed, just checking still required.

Thanks,

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-08-05 15:47:02 Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by
Previous Message Nicolas Barbier 2010-08-05 15:43:22 Re: Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why?