• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
    • pgsql-cluster-hackers
    • pgsql-committers
    • pgsql-hackers
    • pgsql-rrreviewers
    • pgsql-testers
    • pgsql-www
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers 2010-07 Thread Index (1/9)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Kevin Grittner (Sat 31 19:27)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Stephen Frost (Sun 01 01:17)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Robert Haas (Sun 01 01:48)
• More fun with GIN lossy-page pointers Tom Lane (Sat 31 13:57)
• Re: More fun with GIN lossy-page pointers Alvaro Herrera (Sun 01 01:36)
• Re: More fun with GIN lossy-page pointers Tom Lane (Sun 01 01:38)
• rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Tom Lane (Sat 31 04:40)
• Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Robert Haas (Sat 31 12:42)
• Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Tom Lane (Sat 31 16:02)
• Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Robert Haas (Sat 31 16:12)
• Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Tom Lane (Sat 31 16:32)
• Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Robert Haas (Sat 31 16:35)
• Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Tom Lane (Sat 31 16:44)
• Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Tom Lane (Sun 01 02:32)
• ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Tom Lane (Sat 31 03:53)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Stephen Frost (Sat 31 11:08)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Tom Lane (Sat 31 15:00)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Robert Haas (Sat 31 15:47)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Tom Lane (Sat 31 16:06)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Robert Haas (Sat 31 17:32)
• reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1, take two Robert Haas (Fri 30 21:58)
• review patch: Distinguish between unique indexes and unique constraints Kevin Grittner (Thu 29 23:56)
• Re: review patch: Distinguish between unique indexes and unique constraints Robert Haas (Sun 01 01:12)
• On Scalability Vincenzo Romano (Thu 29 17:09)
• Re: On Scalability Joshua D. Drake (Thu 29 17:12)
• Re: On Scalability Vincenzo Romano (Thu 29 17:35)
• Re: On Scalability Joshua D. Drake (Thu 29 17:40)
• Re: On Scalability Vincenzo Romano (Thu 29 17:52)
• Re: On Scalability Joshua D. Drake (Thu 29 18:17)
• Re: On Scalability Josh Berkus (Thu 29 20:09)
• Re: On Scalability Vincenzo Romano (Thu 29 21:30)
• Message not available
• Re: On Scalability Vincenzo Romano (Fri 30 10:24)
• Re: On Scalability Greg Stark (Fri 30 10:50)
• Re: On Scalability Vincenzo Romano (Fri 30 11:41)
• Re: On Scalability Greg Smith (Fri 30 20:38)
• Re: On Scalability Josh Berkus (Fri 30 18:51)
• Re: On Scalability Vincenzo Romano (Fri 30 19:56)
• Re: On Scalability Robert Haas (Fri 30 20:39)
• review: xml_is_well_formed Pavel Stehule (Thu 29 13:22)
• Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Mike Fowler (Fri 30 11:50)
• Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Pavel Stehule (Fri 30 12:52)
• Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Peter Eisentraut (Sat 31 12:10)
• Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Robert Haas (Sat 31 17:40)
• patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Henk Enting (Thu 29 11:04)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Robert Haas (Fri 30 13:45)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Tom Lane (Fri 30 14:11)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Robert Haas (Fri 30 14:19)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Tom Lane (Fri 30 14:23)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Robert Haas (Fri 30 14:32)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Tom Lane (Fri 30 14:46)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Yeb Havinga (Fri 30 15:28)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Tom Lane (Fri 30 15:39)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Robert Haas (Fri 30 15:48)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Robert Haas (Fri 30 15:35)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Robert Haas (Fri 30 16:22)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Alex Hunsaker (Fri 30 17:35)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Yeb Havinga (Fri 30 19:20)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Yeb Havinga (Fri 30 20:37)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Robert Haas (Sat 31 16:02)
• Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Tom Lane (Wed 28 23:33)
• Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Oleg Bartunov (Thu 29 11:03)
• Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Tom Lane (Thu 29 14:03)
• Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Oleg Bartunov (Thu 29 16:13)
• Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Tom Lane (Thu 29 16:28)
• Re: Patch to show individual statement latencies in pgbench output Greg Smith (Wed 28 22:49)
• Re: Patch to show individual statement latencies in pgbench output Florian Pflug (Thu 29 01:24)
• patch saved in commitfest application isn't actual now Pavel Stehule (Wed 28 11:43)
• Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: Adding xpath_exists function David Fetter (Tue 27 23:33)
• Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: Adding xpath_exists function Robert Haas (Tue 27 23:41)
• Re: [RRR] Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: Adding xpath_exists function Jeff Davis (Tue 27 23:56)
• Toward a column reorder solution Nilson (Tue 27 21:32)
• Re: Toward a column reorder solution Andrew Dunstan (Tue 27 21:45)
• Re: Toward a column reorder solution Robert Haas (Tue 27 21:52)
• Re: Toward a column reorder solution Andrew Dunstan (Tue 27 21:56)
• Re: Toward a column reorder solution Joshua D. Drake (Tue 27 22:02)
• Re: Toward a column reorder solution David E. Wheeler (Wed 28 02:55)
• Re: Toward a column reorder solution Joshua D. Drake (Wed 28 14:57)
• Re: Toward a column reorder solution David E. Wheeler (Wed 28 16:30)
• Re: Toward a column reorder solution Joshua D. Drake (Wed 28 16:34)
• Re: Toward a column reorder solution Nilson Damasceno (Tue 27 22:03)
• Re: Toward a column reorder solution Andrew Dunstan (Tue 27 23:08)
• ALTER TABLE ... DISABLE TRIGGER vs. AccessExclusiveLock James Robinson (Tue 27 19:31)
• Re: ALTER TABLE ... DISABLE TRIGGER vs. AccessExclusiveLock Robert Haas (Tue 27 19:36)
• page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Jeff Davis (Tue 27 18:12)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (Tue 27 19:50)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Jeff Davis (Tue 27 21:19)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (Tue 27 21:20)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Jeff Davis (Tue 27 22:30)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Jeff Davis (Wed 28 04:24)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (Wed 28 10:40)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Jeff Davis (Wed 28 16:13)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Tom Lane (Wed 28 16:36)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Jeff Davis (Wed 28 17:18)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (Wed 28 17:19)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Jeff Davis (Wed 28 17:28)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Tom Lane (Wed 28 18:22)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (Wed 28 18:50)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Jeff Davis (Wed 28 19:08)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (Wed 28 19:09)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Tom Lane (Wed 28 19:16)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Tom Lane (Wed 28 19:38)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Jeff Davis (Wed 28 21:22)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Simon Riggs (Thu 29 08:58)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (Thu 29 13:10)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Tom Lane (Thu 29 14:35)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (Thu 29 14:48)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Tom Lane (Thu 29 15:09)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (Thu 29 16:17)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (Wed 28 19:49)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Simon Riggs (Wed 28 11:03)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (Wed 28 11:29)
• do we need to postpone beta4? Robert Haas (Tue 27 18:04)
• Re: do we need to postpone beta4? Tom Lane (Tue 27 18:11)
• Re: do we need to postpone beta4? Joshua D. Drake (Tue 27 18:18)
• Re: do we need to postpone beta4? Robert Haas (Tue 27 19:34)
• Re: do we need to postpone beta4? Bruce Momjian (Tue 27 19:53)
• Re: do we need to postpone beta4? Robert Haas (Tue 27 20:06)
• Re: do we need to postpone beta4? Tom Lane (Tue 27 20:09)
• Re: do we need to postpone beta4? Robert Haas (Tue 27 20:49)
• Re: do we need to postpone beta4? Robert Haas (Tue 27 21:47)
• Re: do we need to postpone beta4? Tom Lane (Tue 27 22:42)
• Re: do we need to postpone beta4? Robert Haas (Tue 27 23:02)
• Re: do we need to postpone beta4? Robert Haas (Wed 28 22:58)
• Re: do we need to postpone beta4? Tom Lane (Wed 28 23:36)
• PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 Josh Berkus (Tue 27 17:13)
• Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 Robert Haas (Tue 27 17:39)
• Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 Andrew Dunstan (Tue 27 18:36)
• Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 Tom Lane (Tue 27 22:28)
• Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 Andrew Dunstan (Wed 28 04:41)
• Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 Mark Cave-Ayland (Wed 28 10:30)
• Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 Andrew Dunstan (Wed 28 11:10)
• Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 Mark Cave-Ayland (Wed 28 11:24)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add restart_after_crash GUC. Fujii Masao (Tue 27 06:33)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add restart_after_crash GUC. Robert Haas (Tue 27 16:07)
• merge command - GSoC progress Boxuan Zhai (Tue 27 05:04)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Robert Haas (Tue 27 17:07)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Boxuan Zhai (Wed 28 10:08)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Robert Haas (Wed 28 10:28)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Boxuan Zhai (Wed 28 15:51)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Robert Haas (Thu 29 20:51)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Greg Smith (Fri 30 16:22)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Robert Haas (Fri 30 16:31)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Andres Freund (Fri 30 16:33)
• SSL cipher and version Robert Haas (Mon 26 13:49)
• Re: SSL cipher and version Dave Page (Mon 26 13:58)
• Re: SSL cipher and version Robert Haas (Mon 26 14:45)
• Re: SSL cipher and version Tom Lane (Tue 27 04:06)
• Re: SSL cipher and version Robert Haas (Tue 27 23:44)
• Improper usage of MemoryContext in nodeSubplan.c for buildSubPlanHash() function. This maybe causes allocate memory failed. Tao Ma (Mon 26 10:26)
• Re: Improper usage of MemoryContext in nodeSubplan.c for buildSubPlanHash() function. This maybe causes allocate memory failed. Tom Lane (Wed 28 03:19)
• Re: Improper usage of MemoryContext in nodeSubplan.c for buildSubPlanHash() function. This maybe causes allocate memory failed. Tom Lane (Wed 28 04:55)
• quorum commit Re: Synchronous replication Fujii Masao (Mon 26 08:58)
• Re: quorum commit Re: Synchronous replication Yeb Havinga (Mon 26 09:30)
• psql \timing output supressed in quiet mode Peter Eisentraut (Sun 25 09:58)
• Re: psql \timing output supressed in quiet mode Robert Haas (Sun 25 21:42)
• Re: psql \timing output supressed in quiet mode Kevin Grittner (Mon 26 13:41)
• patch: utf8_to_unicode (trivial) Joseph Adams (Sun 25 02:35)
• TwoPO: experimental join order algorithm Adriano Lange (Sat 24 13:20)
• Re: TwoPO: experimental join order algorithm Robert Haas (Sun 25 21:44)
• Re: TwoPO: experimental join order algorithm Adriano Lange (Sun 25 22:46)
• Re: TwoPO: experimental join order algorithm Robert Haas (Sun 25 23:17)
• Re: TwoPO: experimental join order algorithm Adriano Lange (Mon 26 02:17)
• Re: TwoPO: experimental join order algorithm Jan Urbański (Fri 30 10:59)
• Review of Synchronous Replication patches Yeb Havinga (Sat 24 06:55)
• Re: Review of Synchronous Replication patches zb (Sat 24 07:50)
• Re: Review of Synchronous Replication patches Yeb Havinga (Sat 24 12:16)
• Re: Review of Synchronous Replication patches zb (Sat 24 13:16)
• Re: Review of Synchronous Replication patches Fujii Masao (Mon 26 07:21)
• non-overlapping, consecutive partitions Hans-Jürgen Schönig (Fri 23 20:04)
• Re: non-overlapping, consecutive partitions Marko Tiikkaja (Fri 23 20:15)
• Re: non-overlapping, consecutive partitions Martijn van Oosterhout (Sun 25 09:56)
• Re: non-overlapping, consecutive partitions PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig (Sun 25 14:41)
• Re: non-overlapping, consecutive partitions Robert Haas (Sun 25 21:33)
• Re: non-overlapping, consecutive partitions Greg Stark (Sun 25 22:41)
• Re: non-overlapping, consecutive partitions Robert Haas (Sun 25 23:14)
• Re: non-overlapping, consecutive partitions Hans-Jürgen Schönig (Thu 29 15:12)
• reminder... beta4 is coming Robert Haas (Fri 23 19:12)
• permission inconsistency with functions Joshua D. Drake (Fri 23 18:49)
• Re: permission inconsistency with functions Peter Eisentraut (Fri 23 18:56)
• Re: permission inconsistency with functions Joshua D. Drake (Fri 23 19:05)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc