Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
- Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:38:18 -0500
- Message-id: <15794.1259631498@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Uh, we weren't even done reviewing this were we? > Uh, I am new to this commitfest wiki thing, but it did have a review by > Euler Taveira de Oliveira: > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=196 > and the author replied. Is there more that needs to be done? It wasn't marked Ready For Committer, so presumably the reviewer wasn't done with it. I know I hadn't looked at it at all, because I was waiting for the commitfest review process to finish. regards, tom lane
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- References:
- Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Prev by Date: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Next by Date: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Previous by thread: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Next by thread: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Indexes: